Cited by 210Bioinformatics and Genomic NetworksBiomedical Text Mining and OntologiesComputational Drug Discovery Methods

HumanNet v2: human gene networks for disease research

Open access
Hwang, Sohyun, Kim, Chan Yeong, Yang, Sunmo, Kim, Eiru, Hart, Traver, Marcotte, Edward M, Lee, Insuk·2019·Nucleic Acids Research

Abstract

Human gene networks have proven useful in many aspects of disease research, with numerous network-based strategies developed for generating hypotheses about gene-disease-drug associations. The ability to predict and organize genes most relevant to a specific disease has proven especially important. We previously developed a human functional gene network, HumanNet, by integrating diverse types of omics data using Bayesian statistics framework and demonstrated its ability to retrieve disease genes. Here, we present HumanNet v2 (http://www.inetbio.org/humannet), a database of human gene networks, which was updated by incorporating new data types, extending data sources and improving network inference algorithms. HumanNet now comprises a hierarchy of human gene networks, allowing for more flexible incorporation of network information into studies. HumanNet performs well in ranking disease-linked gene sets with minimal literature-dependent biases. We observe that incorporating model organisms' protein-protein interactions does not markedly improve disease gene predictions, suggesting that many of the disease gene associations are now captured directly in human-derived datasets. With an improved interactive user interface for disease network analysis, we expect HumanNet will be a useful resource for network medicine.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/nar/gky1126

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [23]Nishimura D. BioCarta. Biotech Softw. Int. Rep. 2001; 2: 117– 120.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hwang, S., Kim, C. Y., Yang, S., Kim, E., Hart, T., Marcotte, E. M., & Lee, I.
Affiliations
  • Yonsei University (KR)
  • The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Corresponding author
Lee, Insuk
Venue
Nucleic Acids Research
Published
2018-11-10
Volume
47
Issue
D1
Pages
D573-D580
ISSN
  • 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
  • 1362-4962
OpenAlex
W2899728356
Cited by
210
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 2
FWCI
8.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nucleic Acids Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2018M3C9A5064709, NRF-2018R1A5A2025079, NRF-2018R1C1B5032617)
  • Welch Foundation (F-1515)
  • Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas (RR160032)
  • National Institutes of Health (R35GM130119, P30 CA016672)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
Keywords
disease gene prediction, network medicine, gene-disease association, network inference algorithms, multi-omics integration
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Disease, Humans, User-Computer Interface, Databases, Genetic, Gene Regulatory Networks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review