Cited by 198Epigenetics and DNA MethylationGenomics and Phylogenetic StudiesGenomics and Chromatin Dynamics

CGmapTools improves the precision of heterozygous SNV calls and supports allele-specific methylation detection and visualization in bisulfite-sequencing data

Open access
Guo, Weilong, Zhu, Ping, Pellegrini, Matteo, Zhang, Michael Q, Wang, Xiangfeng, Ni, Zhongfu·2018·Bioinformatics

Abstract

Motivation DNA methylation is important for gene silencing and imprinting in both plants and animals. Recent advances in bisulfite sequencing allow detection of single nucleotide variations (SNVs) achieving high sensitivity, but accurately identifying heterozygous SNVs from partially C-to-T converted sequences remains challenging. Results We designed two methods, BayesWC and BinomWC, that substantially improved the precision of heterozygous SNV calls from ∼80% to 99% while retaining comparable recalls. With these SNV calls, we provided functions for allele-specific DNA methylation (ASM) analysis and visualizing the methylation status on reads. Applying ASM analysis to a previous dataset, we found that an average of 1.5% of investigated regions showed allelic methylation, which were significantly enriched in transposon elements and likely to be shared by the same cell-type. A dynamic fragment strategy was utilized for DMR analysis in low-coverage data and was able to find differentially methylated regions (DMRs) related to key genes involved in tumorigenesis using a public cancer dataset. Finally, we integrated 40 applications into the software package CGmapTools to analyze DNA methylomes. This package uses CGmap as the format interface, and designs binary formats to reduce the file size and support fast data retrieval, and can be applied for context-wise, gene-wise, bin-wise, region-wise and sample-wise analyses and visualizations. Availability and implementation The CGmapToo…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx595

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Guo, W., Zhu, P., Pellegrini, M., Zhang, M. Q., Wang, X., & Ni, Z.
Affiliations
  • China Agricultural University (CN)
  • Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College (CN)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • The University of Texas at Dallas (US)
  • Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Food Nutrition and Human Health (CN)
Corresponding author
Guo, Weilong
Venue
Bioinformatics
Published
2017-09-18
Volume
34
Issue
3
Pages
381-387
ISSN
  • 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
  • 1367-4811
OpenAlex
W2754256904
Cited by
198
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 8
FWCI
4.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Bioinformatics (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (31701415 and 91435204)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
Keywords
allele-specific methylation, bisulfite sequencing, differentially methylated regions
MeSH terms
Alleles, Animals, Heterozygote, Humans, Software, Sulfites, Sequence Analysis, DNA, DNA Methylation, Genomics, Eukaryota

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review