The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
ACTINN: automated identification of cell types in single cell RNA sequencing
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Abstract Cell type identification is one of the major goals in single cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq). Current methods for assigning cell types typically involve the use of unsupervised clustering, the identification of signature genes in each cluster, followed by a manual lookup of these genes in the literature and databases to assign cell types. However, there are several limitations associated with these approaches, such as unwanted sources of variation that influence clustering and a lack of canonical markers for certain cell types. Here, we present ACTINN (Automated Cell Type Identification using Neural Networks), which employs a neural network with 3 hidden layers, trains on datasets with predefined cell types, and predicts cell types for other datasets based on the trained parameters. We trained the neural network on a mouse cell type atlas (Tabula Muris Atlas) and a human immune cell dataset, and used it to predict cell types for mouse leukocytes, human PBMCs and human T cell sub types. The results showed that our neural network is fast and accurate, and should therefore be a useful tool to complement existing scRNA-seq pipelines. Author Summary Single cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) provides high resolution profiling of the transcriptomes of individual cells, which inevitably results in high volumes of data that require complex data processing pipelines. Usually, one of the first steps in the analysis of scRNA-seq is to assign individual cells to known cell types. To accomplish this, traditional methods first group the cells into different clusters, then find marker genes, and finally use these to manually assign cell types for each cluster. Thus these methods require prior knowledge of cell type canonical markers, and some level of subjectivity to make the cell type assignments. As a result, the process is often laborious and requires domain specific expertise, which is a barrier for inexperienced users. By contrast, our neural network ACTINN automatically learns the features for each predefined cell type and uses these features to predict cell types for individual cells. This approach is computationally efficient and requires no domain expertise of the tissues being studied. We believe ACTINN allows users to rapidly identify cell types in their datasets, thus rendering the analysis of their scRNA-seq datasets more efficient.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Furthermore, the parameter settings of HVG selection and PCA in these methods are far to reach a consensus and inevitably introduce artificial bias for performance evaluation 15- 19 .”
From scBERT as a Large-scale Pretrained Deep Language Model for Cell Type Annotation of Single-cell RNA-seq Data (2021) · cites this paper as [15]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Integrating single-cell transcriptomic data across different conditions, technologies, and species
Butler, A., Hoffman, P., Smibert, P., Papalexi, E., & Satija, R. (2018) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.4096 · Cited by 13,174
Massively parallel digital transcriptional profiling of single cells
Zheng, G. X. Y., Terry, J. M., Belgrader, P., Ryvkin, P., Bent, Z. W., Wilson, R., Ziraldo, S. B., Wheeler, T. D., McDermott, G. P., Zhu, J., et al. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms14049 · Cited by 7,353
Deep generative modeling for single-cell transcriptomics
Lopez, R., Regier, J., Cole, M. B., Jordan, M. I., & Yosef, N. (2018) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-018-0229-2 · Cited by 2,530
Batch effects in single-cell RNA-sequencing data are corrected by matching mutual nearest neighbors
Haghverdi, L., Lun, A. T. L., Morgan, M. D., & Marioni, J. C. (2018) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.4091 · Cited by 2,416
Single-cell RNA sequencing technologies and bioinformatics pipelines
Hwang, B., Lee, J. H., & Bang, D. (2018) · Experimental & Molecular Medicine · doi:10.1038/s12276-018-0071-8 · Cited by 1,866
Winkels, H., Ehinger, E., Vassallo, M., Buscher, K., Dinh, H. Q., Kobiyama, K., Hamers, A. A. J., Cochain, C., Vafadarnejad, E., Saliba, A.-E., et al. (2018) · Circulation Research · doi:10.1161/circresaha.117.312513 · Cited by 547
Tan, Y., & Cahan, P. (2019) · Cell Systems · doi:10.1016/j.cels.2019.06.004 · Cited by 368
Using neural networks for reducing the dimensions of single-cell RNA-Seq data
Lin, C., Jain, S., Kim, H., & Bar-Joseph, Z. (2017) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkx681 · Cited by 197
Removal of batch effects using distribution-matching residual networks
Shaham, U., Stanton, K., Zhao, J., Li, H., Raddassi, K., Montgomery, R. R., & Kluger, Y. (2017) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btx196 · Cited by 170
Lieberman, Y., Rokach, L., & Shay, T. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0205499 · Cited by 113
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- 2010, Proceedings of the thirteenth international conference on artificial intelligence and statistics, PMLR, 9, 249
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–253 of 253
Zhong, J., Yang, J., Song, Y., Zhang, Z., Wang, C., Tong, R., Li, C., Yu, N., Zou, L., Liu, S., et al. (2023) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2023.09.16.558051
Attention Based Models for Cell Type Classification on Single-Cell RNA-Seq Data
Wang, T., Fan, Y., & Ma, X. (2023) · Frontiers in artificial intelligence and applications · doi:10.3233/faia230557
Zhao, K., Bhandari, S., Whitener, N. P., Grayson, J. M., & Khuri, N. (2023) · ACM International Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology, and Health Informatics (ACM-BCB) · doi:10.1145/3584371.3613072
Wang, Q., Song, J. J., & Zhang, F. (2023) · Cellular Oncology · doi:10.1007/s13402-023-00879-6
A Graph Neural Network with Multiple Auxiliary Tasks for Accurate Single Cell Classiଁcation
Shuan, L., Han, P., hu, H., Yang, B., Liu, M. C., & Li, Z. (2023) · doi:10.1145/3614008.3614027
Zhu, Z.-P., Han, P., Wang, L., Dong, X., Liu, S., & Li, Z. (2023) · doi:10.1145/3614008.3614029
Yan, R., Fan, C., Gu, S., Wang, T., Yin, Z., & Chen, X. (2023) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2023.11.05.565588
Two-Stage Alignment Framework for Batch Effect Removal and Cell Type Classification in ScRNA-seq
Li, A., Zhou, Y., Zhang, W., Shao, W., & Zhu, Q. (2023) · Asian Conference on Artificial Intelligence Technology (ACAIT) · doi:10.1109/acait60137.2023.10528562
STPDA: Leveraging spatial-temporal patterns for downstream analysis in spatial transcriptomic data
Shi, M., Cheng, X., & Dai, Y. (2024) · Computational Biology and Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2024.108127
VICTOR: Validation and inspection of cell type annotation through optimal regression
Chang, C.-J., Hsu, C., Liu, Q., & Shyr, Y. (2024) · Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1016/j.csbj.2024.08.028
Dai, H., Meng, X., Pan, Z., Yang, Q., Song, H., Gao, Y., & Wang, X. (2024) · IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics · doi:10.1109/jbhi.2024.3487174
Drug Repositioning Using Single-Cell RNA Sequencing in Cancer Research
Abdullah‐Zawawi, M., Chan, S. N., Tieng, F. Y. F., Mohamed‐Hussein, Z., & Mutalib, N. A. (2024) · Interdisciplinary cancer research · doi:10.1007/16833_2024_441
Braud, L., Bernabe, M., Vernerey, J., Miranda, A. M. A., Dominguez, A., Churikov, D., Richaud, M., McAllan, L., Lachaud, C., Gil, J., et al. (2025) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2025.01.06.631346
Target-oriented Reference Construction for supervised cell type identification in scRNA-seq
Wei, X., Ma, W., Wu, Z. J., & Wu, H. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM) · doi:10.1109/bibm62325.2024.10822047
Sensitivity based model agnostic scalable explanations of deep learningPreprint
Aggarwal, M., Cogan, N., & Periwal, V. (2025) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2025.02.21.639516
Das, A., Das, G., Chakrabarti, A., & Ghosh, Z. (2025) · Lecture notes in networks and systems · doi:10.1007/978-981-97-9762-2_15
Gene print-based cell subtypes annotation of human disease across heterogeneous datasets with gPRINT
Yan, R., Fan, C., Gu, S., Wang, T., Yin, Z., & Chen, X. (2025) · Protein & Cell · doi:10.1093/procel/pwaf001
Detecting Cell Type Identity Through Marker Genes: An Explainable Approach with Capsule NetworksPreprint
Ray, S., & Schönhuth, A. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5245685
Jogani, S., Pol, A. S., Prajapati, M., Samal, A., Bhatia, K., Parmar, J., Patel, U., Shah, F., Vyas, N., & Gupta, S. K. (2025) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbaf243
mCAFoundation: A Single-Cell RNA Sequencing Foundation Model for Mouse Cell Types AnnotationsPreprint
Zheng, C., Wu, X., Zhu, H., Liu, X., Yang, A., He, R., Zhou, X., Wu, T., Xu, G., & Xie, Y. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5643031
Shah, H., Aung, S., Idris, A., & Giribabu, N. (2025) · International Journal of Clinical Medical Research · doi:10.61466/ijcmr3060003
Pattern Learning and Knowledge Distillation for Single-Cell Data Annotation
Zhang, M., Ren, B., & Li, X. (2025) · Biology · doi:10.3390/biology15010002
Additional file 1 of Analysis of single-cell RNA sequencing data based on autoencoders
Tangherloni, A., Ricciuti, F., Besozzi, D., Liò, P., & Cvejic, A. (2021) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.14752027
Additional file 3 of SCIPAC: quantitative estimation of cell-phenotype associations
Gan, D., Zhu, Y., Lü, X., & Li, J. (2024) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.26719689
Additional file 1 of DANCE: a deep learning library and benchmark platform for single-cell analysis
Ding, J., Liu, R., Wen, H., Tang, W., Li, Z., Venegas, J., Su, R., Molho, D., Jin, W., Wang, Y., et al. (2024) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.26695245
Additional file 4 of DANCE: a deep learning library and benchmark platform for single-cell analysis
Ding, J., Liu, R., Wen, H., Tang, W., Li, Z., Venegas, J., Su, R., Molho, D., Jin, W., Wang, Y., et al. (2024) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.26695254
Additional file 2 of DANCE: a deep learning library and benchmark platform for single-cell analysis
Ding, J., Liu, R., Wen, H., Tang, W., Li, Z., Venegas, J., Su, R., Molho, D., Jin, W., Wang, Y., et al. (2024) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.26695248
Additional file 3 of DANCE: a deep learning library and benchmark platform for single-cell analysis
Ding, J., Liu, R., Wen, H., Tang, W., Li, Z., Venegas, J., Su, R., Molho, D., Jin, W., Wang, Y., et al. (2024) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.26695251
Additional file 5 of DANCE: a deep learning library and benchmark platform for single-cell analysis
Ding, J., Liu, R., Wen, H., Tang, W., Li, Z., Venegas, J., Su, R., Molho, D., Jin, W., Wang, Y., et al. (2024) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.26695257
Additional file 6 of DANCE: a deep learning library and benchmark platform for single-cell analysis
Ding, J., Liu, R., Wen, H., Tang, W., Li, Z., Venegas, J., Su, R., Molho, D., Jin, W., Wang, Y., et al. (2024) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.26695260
Additional file 2 of SCIPAC: quantitative estimation of cell-phenotype associations
Gan, D., Zhu, Y., Lü, X., & Li, J. (2024) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.26719686
Additional file 1 of SCIPAC: quantitative estimation of cell-phenotype associations
Gan, D., Zhu, Y., Lü, X., & Li, J. (2024) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.26719683
Balcı, M. A., Kuralay, S. C., Aksel, E. G., Shahpar, Z., Kayalar, Ö., & Eldem, V. (2025) · Springer handbooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-81728-1_38
Min, S., Lac, L., & Hu, P. (2026) · Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1016/j.csbj.2026.01.010 · Cited by 1
Sharma, D., Samreen, A., Nair, A., & Arumugam, S. (2026) · In Silico Pharmacology · doi:10.1007/s40203-026-00585-9
Galvão, I. C., Lemoine, M., Waichman, T. V., Chandarana, B., Hébert, S., de Oliveira, T. C., dos Santos, L. H. B., Rogério, F., Yasuda, C. L., Ghizoni, E., et al. (2026) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.64898/2026.02.20.707029
Sontake, V., Kartha, V. K., Sahu, N., Fuentes, D., Chio, L., Miyazaki, H., Chen, J., Gupta, A., Nonora, J., Vaidyanathan, A., et al. (2026) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.64898/2026.02.26.708253
DyGFormer:Transformer With Resistance-Distance Bias for Semi-Supervised Cell-Type Identification
Dang, Y., Liu, W., Han, X., & Liu, B. Y. (2026) · IEEE Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1109/tcbbio.2026.3676606
Pathway-informed Universal Domain Adaptation for Single-cell RNA-seq DataPreprint
Wei, X., Li, X., Liu, H., Du, G., Wei, F., & Shang, X. (2026) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.64898/2026.05.07.723423
scHilda: Hierarchical Integration of LLM with KG database for single cell type annotation
Li, Y., Sun, Y., Geng, A., Xu, J., Meng, Y., Cui, F., Wei, L., Zou, Q., Li, X., & Zhang, Z. (2026) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1014291
Sun, N., Guan, M., Zhou, P., & Yau, S. S.-T. (2026) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/s12859-026-06508-x
Park, C., Choi, J. M., & Chae, H. (2026) · Journal of Computational Biology · doi:10.1177/15578666261457147
Transformers for single-cell RNA sequencing: a survey
Hu, T., & Wei, Z. (2026) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbag332
scGMB: A scRNA‐seq Cell Classification Method Combining GCN and Mamba
Gong, L., Like, Y., Ji, Y., & Xu, S. (2026) · IET Systems Biology · doi:10.1049/syb2.70079
Jiang, S., Qi, C., Chen, Y., Song, X., & Wei, Z. (2026) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.64898/2026.07.06.736807
Long, Y., Zhang, W., Cao, L., Huang, X., & Wang, Y. (2026) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1014602
Bai, J., Zhou, F., Tan, C., Gao, Y., He, Y., Huang, X., & Wang, Y. (2026) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1014638
Yuan, L., Cao, J., Sun, S., Wang, S., Ye, L., & Huang, D.-S. (2026) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1014607
Fanijo, S. O., Jannesari, A., & Dickerson, J. (2026) · Machine Learning with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.mlwa.2026.100983
scGFormer: A Multi-Scale Graph-Transformer for Cell Type Annotation in Single-Cell RNA Sequencing
Yuan, Z., Zhang, H., Liu, C., Zhang, S., Liu, Y., & Tu, L. (2026) · IEEE Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1109/tcbbio.2026.3730687
TORC: Target-Oriented Reference Construction for Supervised Cell-Type Identification in scRNA-seq
Wei, X., Ma, W., Wu, Z., & Wu, H. S. (2026) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-0716-5539-9_5
Metadata
- Authors
- Ma, F., & Pellegrini, M.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- Corresponding author
- Pellegrini, Matteo
- Venue
- Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2019-07-29
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 533-538
- ISSN
- 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
- 1367-4811
- OpenAlex
- W2964643116
- Cited by
- 252
- References
- 12
- Citations by year
- 2026: 25 · 2025: 46 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 5
- FWCI
- 7.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Licence
- academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model (vor)
- Locations
- Bioinformatics (publishedVersion)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science
- Office of Biological and Environmental Research (DE-FC02-02ER63421)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Cell Image Analysis Techniques
- Keywords
- cell type annotation, single-cell RNA sequencing, neural network classification, human peripheral blood mononuclear cells, T cell subsets, immune cell classification, cell type atlas
- MeSH terms
- Algorithms, Animals, Humans, Cluster Analysis, Sequence Analysis, RNA, Gene Expression Profiling, Mice, Single-Cell Analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review