Cited by 198Single-cell and spatial transcriptomicsGene expression and cancer classificationGene Regulatory Network Analysis

Using neural networks for reducing the dimensions of single-cell RNA-Seq data

Open access
Lin, Chieh, Jain, Siddhartha, Kim, Hannah, Bar-Joseph, Ziv·2017·Nucleic Acids Research

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

While only recently developed, the ability to profile expression data in single cells (scRNA-Seq) has already led to several important studies and findings. However, this technology has also raised several new computational challenges. These include questions about the best methods for clustering scRNA-Seq data, how to identify unique group of cells in such experiments, and how to determine the state or function of specific cells based on their expression profile. To address these issues we develop and test a method based on neural networks (NN) for the analysis and retrieval of single cell RNA-Seq data. We tested various NN architectures, some of which incorporate prior biological knowledge, and used these to obtain a reduced dimension representation of the single cell expression data. We show that the NN method improves upon prior methods in both, the ability to correctly group cells in experiments not used in the training and the ability to correctly infer cell type or state by querying a database of tens of thousands of single cell profiles. Such database queries (which can be performed using our web server) will enable researchers to better characterize cells when analyzing heterogeneous scRNA-Seq samples.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/nar/gkx681

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Lin et al. (2017) predicted cell type and state using a deep neural network whose structure was determined based on the hierarchical organization of transcriptional regulatory factors in the nucleus.

    “This idea was recently explored by Lin et al. (2017), who predicted cell type and state using a deep neural network for which the structure was determined based on the hierarchical organization of transcriptional regulatory factors in the nucleus.”

    From Visible Machine Learning for Biomedicine (2018) · cites this paper as Lin et al., 2017

  • Direct incorporation of the biological structure of cells and tissues leads to a ready-made working model of how biological inputs, such as genotype, are compressed to determine outcomes.

    “In contrast, direct incorporation of the biological structure of cells and tissues, such as explored by Lin et al. (2017) and Ma et al. (2018), leads to a ready-made working model of how biological inputs, such as genotype, are compressed to determine outcomes.”

    From Visible Machine Learning for Biomedicine (2018) · cites this paper as Lin et al., 2017

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 65 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lin, C., Jain, S., Kim, H., & Bar-Joseph, Z.
Affiliations
  • Carnegie Mellon University (US)
  • Machine Learning Department, School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA
Venue
Nucleic Acids Research
Published
2017-07-31
Volume
45
Issue
17
Pages
e156-e156
ISSN
  • 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
  • 1362-4962
OpenAlex
W2741564801
Cited by
197
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 1
FWCI
11.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nucleic Acids Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1356505)
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (U01HL122626)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
Keywords
single-cell RNA sequencing, dimensionality reduction, artificial neural networks, cell clustering, cell type annotation, heterogeneous cell populations, web server
MeSH terms
Gene Expression Regulation, Humans, RNA, Software, Cluster Analysis, Neural Networks, Computer, Sequence Analysis, RNA, Computational Biology, Gene Expression Profiling, Protein Interaction Mapping, Databases, Genetic, Multifactor Dimensionality Reduction, Single-Cell Analysis, Datasets as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review