The DOI matches its Crossref record.
THE ANALYSIS OF CONTINGENCY TABLES WITH GROUPINGS BASED ON QUANTITATIVE CHARACTERS
Abstract
F. YATES; THE ANALYSIS OF CONTINGENCY TABLES WITH GROUPINGS BASED ON QUANTITATIVE CHARACTERS, Biometrika, Volume 35, Issue 1-2, 1 May 1948, Pages 176–181, https
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
(2005) · Statistics for Biology and Health · doi:10.1007/0-387-27255-0_9 · Cited by 20,133
Regression Models for Ordinal Data
McCullagh, P. (1980) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1980.tb01109.x · Cited by 4,453
Some Methods for Strengthening the Common χ 2 Tests
Cochran, W. G. (1954) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/3001616 · Cited by 3,718
Bergasa, N. V., Alling, D. W., Talbot, T. L., Swain, M. G., Yurdaydin, C., Turner, M. L., Schmitt, J. M., Walker, E. C., & Jones, E. A. (1995) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-123-3-199508010-00001 · Cited by 365
Metadata
- Authors
- YATES, F.
- Venue
- Biometrika
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1948
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 176-181
- ISSN
- 0006-3444 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-3510
- OpenAlex
- W2053933941
- Cited by
- 203
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: THE ANALYSIS OF CONTINGENCY TABLES WITH GROUPINGS BASED ON QUANTITATIVE CHARACTERS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/biomet/35.1-2.176
- The paper
- YATES, F. (1948). THE ANALYSIS OF CONTINGENCY TABLES WITH GROUPINGS BASED ON QUANTITATIVE CHARACTERS. Biometrika. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/35.1-2.176
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
