The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Probability plotting methods for the analysis for the analysis of data
Abstract
This paper describes and discusses graphical techniques, based on the primitive empirical cumulative distribution function and on quantile (Q-Q) plots, percent (p-p) plots and hybrids of these, which are useful in assessing a one-diamensional sample, either from original data or resulting from analysis. Areas of application include: the comparison of samples; the comparison of distributions; the presentation of results on sensitivities of statistical methods; the analysis of collections of contrasts and of collections of sample variances; the assessment of multivariate contrasts; and the structuring of analysis of variances; mean squares. Many of the objectives and techniques are illustrated by examples.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples)
SHAPIRO, S. S., & WILK, M. B. (1965) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/52.3-4.591 · Cited by 23,480
Self-citationUse of Half-Normal Plots in Interpreting Factorial Two-Level Experiments
Daniel, C. (1959) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1959.10489866 · Cited by 798
Cited by
Monte Carlo sampling methods using Markov chains and their applications.
Hastings, W. K. (1970) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/57.1.97 · Cited by 15,195
Buchner, J., Georgakakis, A., Nandra, K., Hsu, L., Rangel, C., Brightman, M., Merloni, A., Salvato, M., Donley, J., & Kocevski, D. (2014) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322971 · Cited by 1,644
A new improved graphical and quantitative method for detecting bias in meta-analysis
Furuya-Kanamori, L., Barendregt, J. J., & Doi, S. A. R. (2018) · International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare · doi:10.1097/xeb.0000000000000141 · Cited by 1,160
The cognitive control network: Integrated cortical regions with dissociable functions
Cole, M. W., & Schneider, W. (2007) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.03.071 · Cited by 1,091
Penetrance of 845G→A (C282Y) HFE hereditary haemochromatosis mutation in the USA
Beutler, E., Felitti, V. J., Koziol, J. A., Ho, N. J., & Gelbart, T. (2002) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(02)07447-0 · Cited by 823
Metadata
- Authors
- WILK, M. B., & GNANADESIKAN, R.
- Venue
- Biometrika
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1968
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-17
- ISSN
- 0006-3444 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-3510
- OpenAlex
- W4301040373
- Cited by
- 278
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Probability plotting methods for the analysis for the analysis of data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/biomet/55.1.1
- The paper
- WILK, M. B., & GNANADESIKAN, R. (1968). Probability plotting methods for the analysis for the analysis of data. Biometrika. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/55.1.1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
