The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Maximum likelihood estimation via the ECM algorithm: A general framework
Abstract
Two major reasons for the popularity of the EM algorithm are that its maximum step involves only complete-data maximum likelihood estimation, which is often computationally simple, and that its convergence is stable, with each iteration increasing the likelihood. When the associated complete-data maximum likelihood estimation itself is complicated, EM is less attractive because the M-step is computationally unattractive. In many cases, however, complete-data maximum likelihood estimation is relatively simple when conditional on some function of the parameters being estimated. We introduce a class of generalized EM algorithms, which we call the ECM algorithm, for Expectation/Conditional Maximization (CM), that takes advantage of the simplicity of complete-data conditional maximum likelihood estimation by replacing a complicated M-step of EM with several computationally simpler CM-steps. We show that the ECM algorithm shares all the appealing convergence properties of EM, such as always increasing the likelihood, and present several illustrative examples.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Monte Carlo sampling methods using Markov chains and their applications.
Hastings, W. K. (1970) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/57.1.97 · Cited by 15,195
Cited by
Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences
Gelman, A., & Rubin, D. B. (1992) · Statistical Science · doi:10.1214/ss/1177011136 · Cited by 16,627
Self-citationMcLachlan, G., & Peel, D. (2000) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/0471721182 · Cited by 10,991
Precision mapping of quantitative trait loci.
Zeng, Z. B. (1994) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/136.4.1457 · Cited by 3,182
Multiple Imputation for Multivariate Missing-Data Problems: A Data Analyst's Perspective
Schafer, J. L., & Olsen, M. K. (1998) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr3304_5 · Cited by 1,518
Modeling the Drop-Out Mechanism in Repeated-Measures Studies
Little, R. J. A. (1995) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1995.10476615 · Cited by 1,522
Metadata
- Authors
- MENG, X.-L., & RUBIN, D. B.
- Venue
- Biometrika
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1993
- Volume
- 80
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 267-278
- ISSN
- 0006-3444 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-3510
- OpenAlex
- W1967639437
- Cited by
- 1,861
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 21.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Maximum likelihood estimation via the ECM algorithm: A general framework. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/biomet/80.2.267
- The paper
- MENG, X.-L., & RUBIN, D. B. (1993). Maximum likelihood estimation via the ECM algorithm: A general framework. Biometrika. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/80.2.267
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.