Cited by 3,182Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and AnimalsGenetic and phenotypic traits in livestockGenetic Associations and Epidemiology

Precision mapping of quantitative trait loci.

Zeng, Z B·1994·Genetics

Abstract

Adequate separation of effects of possible multiple linked quantitative trait loci (QTLs) on mapping QTLs is the key to increasing the precision of QTL mapping. A new method of QTL mapping is proposed and analyzed in this paper by combining interval mapping with multiple regression. The basis of the proposed method is an interval test in which the test statistic on a marker interval is made to be unaffected by QTLs located outside a defined interval. This is achieved by fitting other genetic markers in the statistical model as a control when performing interval mapping. Compared with the current QTL mapping method (i.e., the interval mapping method which uses a pair or two pairs of markers for mapping QTLs), this method has several advantages. (1) By confining the test to one region at a time, it reduces a multiple dimensional search problem (for multiple QTLs) to a one dimensional search problem. (2) By conditioning linked markers in the test, the sensitivity of the test statistic to the position of individual QTLs is increased, and the precision of QTL mapping can be improved. (3) By selectively and simultaneously using other markers in the analysis, the efficiency of QTL mapping can be also improved. The behavior of the test statistic under the null hypothesis and appropriate critical value of the test statistic for an overall test in a genome are discussed and analyzed. A simulation study of QTL mapping is also presented which illustrates the utility, properties, advantag…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/genetics/136.4.1457

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zeng, Z. B.
Affiliations
North Carolina State University (US)
Corresponding author
Zeng, Z B
Venue
Genetics
Published
1994-04-01
Volume
136
Issue
4
Pages
1457-1468
ISSN
  • 0016-6731 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-2631
OpenAlex
W1864995317
Cited by
3,182
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 34 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 52 · 2023: 47 · 2022: 86 · 2021: 95 · 2020: 74 · 2019: 74 · 2018: 82 · 2017: 78 · 2016: 94 · 2015: 116 · 2014: 120 · 2013: 123 · 2012: 193
FWCI
26.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM-45344, P01GM045344)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
Keywords
quantitative trait loci, QTL mapping, interval mapping, multiple linear regression, test statistics, critical values, precision mapping
MeSH terms
Chromosome Mapping, Models, Genetic, Regression Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review