Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 566

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The simulation smoother for time series models

DE JONG, PIET, SHEPHARD, NEIL·1995·Biometrika

Abstract

Recently suggested procedures for simulating from the posterior density of states given a Gaussian state space time series are refined and extended. We introduce and study the simulation smoother, which draws from the multivariate posterior distribution of the disturbances of the model, so avoiding the degeneracies inherent in state samplers. The technique is important in Gibbs sampling with non-Gaussian time series models, and for performing Bayesian analysis of Gaussian time series.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/biomet/82.2.339

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 20 references

Cited by

See all 566

Metadata

Authors
DE JONG, P., & SHEPHARD, N.
Venue
Biometrika
Published
1995
Volume
82
Issue
2
Pages
339-350
ISSN
  • 0006-3444 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-3510
OpenAlex
W1994823593
Cited by
566
References
20
FWCI
13.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The simulation smoother for time series models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/biomet/82.2.339
The paper
DE JONG, P., & SHEPHARD, N. (1995). The simulation smoother for time series models. Biometrika. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/82.2.339

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.