The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Miscellanea. Small-sample degrees of freedom with multiple imputation
Abstract
An appealing feature of multiple imputation is the simplicity of the rules for combining the multiple complete-data inferences into a final inference, the repeated-imputation inference (Rubin, 1987). This inference is based on a t distribution and is derived from a Bayesian paradigm under the assumption that the complete-data degrees of freedom, νcom, are infinite, but the number of imputations, m, is finite. When νcom is small and there is only a modest proportion of missing data, the calculated repeated-imputation degrees of freedom, νm, for the t reference distribution can be much larger than νcom, which is clearly inappropriate. Following the Bayesian paradigm, we derive an adjusted degrees of freedom, ν̃m, with the following three properties: for fixed m and estimated fraction of missing information, ν̃m monotonically increases in νcom; ν̃m is always less than or equal to νcom; and ν̃m equals νm when νcom is infinite. A small simulation study demonstrates the superior frequentist performance when using ν̃m rather than νm.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
RUBIN, D. B. (1976) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/63.3.581 · Cited by 9,925
Analysis of Incomplete Multivariate Data
Booth, D. E. (2000) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.2000.10486013 · Cited by 5,627
Multiple imputation after 18+ years
Rubin, D. B. (1996) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1996.10476908 · Cited by 4,072
Multiple Imputation for Interval Estimation from Simple Random Samples with Ignorable Nonresponse
Rubin, D. B., & Schenker, N. (1986) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1986.10478280 · Cited by 766
Multiple-Imputation Inferences with Uncongenial Sources of Input
Meng, X.-L. (1994) · Statistical Science · doi:10.1214/ss/1177010269 · Cited by 756
Performing likelihood ratio tests with multiply-imputed data sets
MENG, X.-L., & RUBIN, D. B. (1992) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/79.1.103 · Cited by 366
Cited by
mice: Multivariate Imputation by Chained Equations in R
Buuren, S. V., & Groothuis-Oudshoorn, K. (2011) · Journal of Statistical Software · doi:10.18637/jss.v045.i03 · Cited by 13,870
“By default the number of degrees of freedom is calculated using the method of Barnard and Rubin (1999).”
MethodMultiple imputation using chained equations: Issues and guidance for practice
White, I. R., Royston, P., & Wood, A. M. (2011) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.4067 · Cited by 9,792
Schafer, J. L. (1999) · Statistical Methods in Medical Research · doi:10.1177/096228029900800102 · Cited by 3,949
Multiple Imputation of Missing Values
Royston, P. (2004) · The Stata Journal: Promoting communications on statistics and Stata · doi:10.1177/1536867x0400400301 · Cited by 2,340
Principled missing data methods for researchers
Dong, Y., & Peng, C.-Y. J. (2013) · SpringerPlus · doi:10.1186/2193-1801-2-222 · Cited by 2,208
Metadata
- Authors
- Barnard, J.
- Venue
- Biometrika
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1999-12-01
- Volume
- 86
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 948-955
- ISSN
- 0006-3444 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-3510
- OpenAlex
- W2020960798
- Cited by
- 829
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 5.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Miscellanea. Small-sample degrees of freedom with multiple imputation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/biomet/86.4.948
- The paper
- Barnard, J. (1999). Miscellanea. Small-sample degrees of freedom with multiple imputation. Biometrika. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/86.4.948
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.