Cited by 2,340Statistical Methods and Bayesian InferenceData Analysis with RAdvanced Causal Inference Techniques

Multiple Imputation of Missing Values

Open access
Royston, Patrick·2004·The Stata Journal: Promoting communications on statistics and Stata

Abstract

Following the seminal publications of Rubin about thirty years ago, statisticians have become increasingly aware of the inadequacy of “complete-case” analysis of datasets with missing observations. In medicine, for example, observations may be missing in a sporadic way for different covariates, and a complete-case analysis may omit as many as half of the available cases. Hotdeck imputation was implemented in Stata in 1999 by Mander and Clayton. However, this technique may perform poorly when many rows of data have at least one missing value. This article describes an implementation for Stata of the MICE method of multiple multivariate imputation described by van Buuren, Boshuizen, and Knook (1999). MICE stands for multivariate imputation by chained equations. The basic idea of data analysis with multiple imputation is to create a small number (e.g., 5–10) of copies of the data, each of which has the missing values suitably imputed, and analyze each complete dataset independently. Estimates of parameters of interest are averaged across the copies to give a single estimate. Standard errors are computed according to the “Rubin rules”, devised to allow for the between- and within-imputation components of variation in the parameter estimates. This article describes five ado-files. mvis creates multiple multivariate imputations. uvis imputes missing values for a single variable as a function of several covariates, each with complete data. micombine fits a wide variety of regression models to a multiply imputed dataset, combining the estimates using Rubin's rules, and supports survival analysis models (stcox and streg), categorical data models, generalized linear models, and more. Finally, misplit and mijoin are utilities to intercon-vert datasets created by mvis and by the miset program from John Carlin and colleagues. The use of the routines is illustrated with an example of prognostic modeling in breast cancer.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1536867x0400400301

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Carlin, J. B., N. Li, P. Greenwood, and C. Coffey. 2003. Tools for analyzing multiple imputed datasets. Stata Journal 3(3): 226-244.
  2. Clark, T. G. and D. G. Altman. 2003. Developing a prognostic model in the presence of missing data: an ovarian cancer case study. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 56: 28-37.
  3. Mander, A. and D. Clayton. 1999. sg116: Hotdeck imputation. Stata Technical Bulletin 51: 32-34. In Stata Technical Bulletin Reprints , vol. 9, 196-199. College Station, TX: Stata Press.
  4. Sauerbrei, W. and P. Royston. 1999. Building multivariable prognostic and diagnostic models: transformation of the predictors using fractional polynomials. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A 162: 71-94.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Royston, P.
Affiliations
MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL (GB)
Corresponding author
Royston, Patrick
Venue
The Stata Journal: Promoting communications on statistics and Stata
Published
2004-08
Volume
4
Issue
3
Pages
227-241
ISSN
  • 1536-867X (ISSN-L)
  • 1536-8734
OpenAlex
W2161375627
Cited by
2,340
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 40 · 2025: 49 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 67 · 2022: 99 · 2021: 106 · 2020: 100 · 2019: 107 · 2018: 103 · 2017: 109 · 2016: 123 · 2015: 129 · 2014: 137 · 2013: 179 · 2012: 178
FWCI
46.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Stata Journal Promoting communications on statistics and Stata (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Data Analysis with R
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
Keywords
multiple imputation, chained equations, Stata ado file, missing data, complete case analysis, Rubin's rules, survival analysis, prognostic model, breast cancer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review