Cited by 2Advanced Proteomics Techniques and ApplicationsBiotin and Related StudiesBioinformatics and Genomic Networks

Mapping adipocyte interactome networks by HaloTag-enrichment-mass spectrometry

Open access
Yazaki, Junshi, Yamanashi, Takashi, Nemoto, Shino, Kobayashi, Atsuo, Han, Yong-Woon, Hasegawa, Tomoko, Iwase, Akira, Ishikawa, Masaki +4 more·2024·Biology Methods and Protocols

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Mapping protein interaction complexes in their natural state in vivo is arguably the Holy Grail of protein network analysis. Detection of protein interaction stoichiometry has been an important technical challenge, as few studies have focused on this. This may, however, be solved by artificial intelligence (AI) and proteomics. Here, we describe the development of HaloTag-based affinity purification mass spectrometry (HaloMS), a high-throughput HaloMS assay for protein interaction discovery. The approach enables the rapid capture of newly expressed proteins, eliminating tedious conventional one-by-one assays. As a proof-of-principle, we used HaloMS to evaluate the protein complex interactions of 17 regulatory proteins in human adipocytes. The adipocyte interactome network was validated using an in vitro pull-down assay and AI-based prediction tools. Applying HaloMS to probe adipocyte differentiation facilitated the identification of previously unknown transcription factor (TF)–protein complexes, revealing proteome-wide human adipocyte TF networks and shedding light on how different pathways are integrated.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/biomethods/bpae039

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Yazaki, J., Yamanashi, T., Nemoto, S., Kobayashi, A., Han, Y.-W., Hasegawa, T., Iwase, A., Ishikawa, M., Konno, R., Imami, K., Kawashima, Y., & Seita, J.
Affiliations
  • Setsunan University (JP)
  • University of Tsukuba (JP)
  • RIKEN Center for Integrative Medical Sciences (JP)
  • RIKEN Center for Sustainable Resource Science (JP)
  • Kazusa DNA Research Institute (JP)
Corresponding author
Yazaki, Junshi
Venue
Biology Methods and Protocols
Published
2024
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
bpae039-bpae039
ISSN
2396-8923 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4399117958
Cited by
2
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1
FWCI
0.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biology Methods and Protocols (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nd)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Ministry of Education, Science, Sports, and Culture
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Biotin and Related Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
Keywords
HaloTag, protein-protein interaction, protein complex stoichiometry, adipogenesis, transcriptional regulatory networks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review