Origins of Science Faculty with Education Specialties: Hiring Motivations and Prior Connections Explain Institutional Differences in the SFES Phenomenon
Abstract
Situated in university science departments as potential science-education change agents, science faculty with education specialties (SFES) reported differences in the origin of their positions depending on the nature of their institution. For instance, SFES at PhD-granting institutions most commonly reported being hired to relieve other faculty from teaching and service burdens. At MS-granting institutions, SFES reported being hired primarily to prepare future K–12 science teachers. At primarily undergraduate institutions, SFES reported transitioning to these specialized roles after their initial hire. In our random, stratified sample of 50 interviewed SFES, all were tenured or tenure track, excepting 45% of SFES at PhD-granting institutions. Those non-tenure-track SFES were more likely to have prior institutional connections—as alumni of, through previous employment at, or with a spouse also employed at their institution—than were other SFES. These findings provide new insights into the evolving SFES phenomenon and clarify previously reported differences among SFES.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
(1998) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 18,397 · see citing works
Rising Above The Gathering Storm: Energizing and Employing America for a Brighter Economic Future
Augustine, N. R. (2006) · Cited by 2,066 · see citing works
Qualitative Research: Studying How Things Work
Stake, R. E. (2010) · Cited by 1,189 · see citing works
Singer, S. R., & Smith, K. A. (2013) · Journal of Engineering Education · doi:10.1002/jee.20030 · Cited by 840 · see citing works
PISA 2006: Science Competencies for Tomorrow's World
Schleicher, A. (2007) · Cited by 766 · see citing works
Grounded Theory in Historical Perspective: An Epistemological Account
Bryant, A., & Charmaz, K. (2007) · The SAGE Handbook of Grounded Theory · doi:10.4135/9781848607941.n1 · Cited by 462 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The transcripts were analyzed using a groundedtheory approach to detect emergent themes across the SFES interviewed and through a constant comparative method (Merriam 1998, Bryant and Charmaz 2007, Stake 2010, Trainor 2013).”
MethodTeaching Science in Higher Education: Faculty Professional Development and Barriers to Change
Sunal, D. W., Hodges, J. B., Sunal, C. S., Whitaker, K. W., Freeman, L., Edwards, L., Johnston, R. A., & Odell, M. R. L. (2001) · School Science and Mathematics · doi:10.1111/j.1949-8594.2001.tb18027.x · Cited by 245 · see citing works
Learning our lesson. Review of quality teaching in higher education
Hénard, F. (2010) · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Obstacles to instructional innovation according to college science and mathematics faculty
Walczyk, J. J., Ramsey, L. L., & Zha, P. (2006) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.20119 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
Science Faculty with Education Specialties.
Bush, S. D., Pelaez, N. J., Rudd, J. A., Stevens, M. T., Tanner, K. D., & Williams, K. S. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1162072 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Self-citationBush, S. D., Pelaez, N. J., Rudd, J. A., Stevens, M. T., Tanner, K. D., & Williams, K. S. (2011) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.10-08-0106 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Self-citationOn Hiring Science Faculty with Education Specialties for Your Science (Not Education) Department.
Bush, S. D., Pelaez, N. J., Rudd, J. A., Stevens, M. T., Williams, K. S., Allen, D. E., & Tanner, K. D. (2006) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.06-09-0189 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Self-citationBush, S. D., Pelaez, N. J., Rudd, J. A., et al. (2013) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1218821110 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Self-citationBush, S. D., Rudd, J. A., Stevens, M. T., Tanner, K. D., & Williams, K. S. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0150914 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Self-citationAddy, T. M., Simmons, P. E., Gardner, G. E., et al. (2015) · The journal of college science teaching · doi:10.2505/4/jcst15_044_03_91 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Trainor AA. 2013. Interview research. Pages 125-138 in Trainor AA, Graue E, eds. Reviewing Qualitative Research in the Social Sciences. Routledge.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Driessen, E. P., Steele, A. L., Costello, R. A., Brewer, P., & Ballen, C. J. (2024) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0312243 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
- Authors
- Bush, S. D., Stevens, M. T., Tanner, K. D., & Williams, K. S.
- Venue
- BioScience
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2017-03-15
- Volume
- 67
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 452-463
- ISSN
- 0006-3568 (ISSN-L)
- 1525-3244
- OpenAlex
- W2611572273
- Cited by
- 15
- References
- 16
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2
- FWCI
- 2.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- BioScience (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Research, Science, and Academia
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Career Development and Diversity
- Keywords
- institutional differences, primarily undergraduate institutions, science teacher education
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
