The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Combining diagnostic test results to increase accuracy
Abstract
When multiple diagnostic tests are performed on an individual or multiple disease markers are available it may be possible to combine the information to diagnose disease. We consider how to choose linear combinations of markers in order to optimize diagnostic accuracy. The accuracy index to be maximized is the area or partial area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. We propose a distribution-free rank-based approach for optimizing the area under the ROC curve and compare it with logistic regression and with classic linear discriminant analysis (LDA). It has been shown that the latter method optimizes the area under the ROC curve when test results have a multivariate normal distribution for diseased and non-diseased populations. Simulation studies suggest that the proposed non-parametric method is efficient when data are multivariate normal.The distribution-free method is generalized to a smooth distribution-free approach to: (i) accommodate some reasonable smoothness assumptions; (ii) incorporate covariate effects; and (iii) yield optimized partial areas under the ROC curve. This latter feature is particularly important since it allows one to focus on a region of the ROC curve which is of most relevance to clinical practice. Neither logistic regression nor LDA necessarily maximize partial areas. The approaches are illustrated on two cancer datasets, one involving serum antigen markers for pancreatic cancer and the other involving longitudinal prostate specific antigen data.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Biomarkers: Potential uses and limitations
Mayeux, R. (2004) · NeuroRX · doi:10.1602/neurorx.1.2.182 · Cited by 916
Obuchowski (2005) · doi:10.2214/ajr.184.2.01840364 · Cited by 321
Metabolomics and Cardiovascular Biomarker Discovery
Rhee, E. P., & Gerszten, R. E. (2012) · Clinical Chemistry · doi:10.1373/clinchem.2011.169573 · Cited by 232
Progress Update: Fluid and Imaging Biomarkers in Alzheimer’s Disease
Sutphen, C. L., Fagan, A. M., & Holtzman, D. M. (2014) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2013.07.031 · Cited by 31
Functional brain abnormalities in major depressive disorder using the Hilbert-Huang transform
Yu, H., Li, F., Wu, T., Li, R., Yao, L., Wang, C., & Wu, X. (2018) · Brain Imaging and Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11682-017-9816-6 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- Pepe, M. S.
- Venue
- Biostatistics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2000-06-01
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 123-140
- ISSN
- 1465-4644 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2113394953
- Cited by
- 303
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Combining diagnostic test results to increase accuracy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/biostatistics/1.2.123
- The paper
- Pepe, M. S. (2000). Combining diagnostic test results to increase accuracy. Biostatistics. https://doi.org/10.1093/biostatistics/1.2.123
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.