The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Detecting differential gene expression with a semiparametric hierarchical mixture method
Abstract
Mixture modeling provides an effective approach to the differential expression problem in microarray data analysis. Methods based on fully parametric mixture models are available, but lack of fit in some examples indicates that more flexible models may be beneficial. Existing, more flexible, mixture models work at the level of one-dimensional gene-specific summary statistics, and so when there are relatively few measurements per gene these methods may not provide sensitive detectors of differential expression. We propose a hierarchical mixture model to provide methodology that is both sensitive in detecting differential expression and sufficiently flexible to account for the complex variability of normalized microarray data. EM-based algorithms are used to fit both parametric and semiparametric versions of the model. We restrict attention to the two-sample comparison problem; an experiment involving Affymetrix microarrays and yeast translation provides the motivating case study. Gene-specific posterior probabilities of differential expression form the basis of statistical inference; they define short gene lists and false discovery rates. Compared to several competing methodologies, the proposed methodology exhibits good operating characteristics in a simulation study, on the analysis of spike-in data, and in a cross-validation calculation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistical significance for genomewide studies
Storey, J. D., & Tibshirani, R. (2003) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1530509100 · Cited by 9,692
Model-based analysis of oligonucleotide arrays: Expression index computation and outlier detection.
Li, C., & Wong, W. H. (2001) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.98.1.31 · Cited by 3,133
Cited by
Microarray data analysis: from disarray to consolidation and consensus
Allison, D. B., Cui, X., Page, G. P., & Sabripour, M. (2006) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg1749 · Cited by 1,339
Cohen, K. W., Linderman, S. L., Moodie, Z., Czartoski, J., Lai, L., Mantus, G., Norwood, C., Nyhoff, L. E., Edara, V. V., Floyd, K., et al. (2021) · Cell Reports Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.xcrm.2021.100354 · Cited by 441
Size, power and false discovery rates
Efron, B. (2007) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/009053606000001460 · Cited by 411
scCODA is a Bayesian model for compositional single-cell data analysis
Büttner, M., Ostner, J., Müller, C. L., Theis, F. J., & Schubert, B. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-27150-6 · Cited by 388
BASiCS: Bayesian Analysis of Single-Cell Sequencing Data
Vallejos, C. A., Marioni, J. C., & Richardson, S. (2015) · PLOS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004333 · Cited by 302
Metadata
- Authors
- Newton, M. A.
- Venue
- Biostatistics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2004-04-01
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 155-176
- ISSN
- 1465-4644 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2170264612
- Cited by
- 564
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 11.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Detecting differential gene expression with a semiparametric hierarchical mixture method. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/biostatistics/5.2.155
- The paper
- Newton, M. A. (2004). Detecting differential gene expression with a semiparametric hierarchical mixture method. Biostatistics. https://doi.org/10.1093/biostatistics/5.2.155
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.