Cited by 441SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchImmune responses and vaccinationsCOVID-19 Clinical Research Studies

Longitudinal analysis shows durable and broad immune memory after SARS-CoV-2 infection with persisting antibody responses and memory B and T cells

Open access
Cohen, Kristen W., Linderman, Susanne L., Moodie, Zoe, Czartoski, Julie, Lai, Lilin, Mantus, Grace, Norwood, Carson, Nyhoff, Lindsay E. +25 more·2021·Cell Reports Medicine

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Ending the COVID-19 pandemic will require long-lived immunity to SARS-CoV-2. Here, we evaluate 254 COVID-19 patients longitudinally up to 8 months and find durable broad-based immune responses. SARS-CoV-2 spike binding and neutralizing antibodies exhibit a bi-phasic decay with an extended half-life of >200 days suggesting the generation of longer-lived plasma cells. SARS-CoV-2 infection also boosts antibody titers to SARS-CoV-1 and common betacoronaviruses. In addition, spike-specific IgG+ memory B cells persist, which bodes well for a rapid antibody response upon virus re-exposure or vaccination. Virus-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cells are polyfunctional and maintained with an estimated half-life of 200 days. Interestingly, CD4+ T cell responses equally target several SARS-CoV-2 proteins, whereas the CD8+ T cell responses preferentially target the nucleoprotein, highlighting the potential importance of including the nucleoprotein in future vaccines. Taken together, these results suggest that broad and effective immunity may persist long-term in recovered COVID-19 patients.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.xcrm.2021.100354

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cohen, K. W., Linderman, S. L., Moodie, Z., Czartoski, J., Lai, L., Mantus, G., Norwood, C., Nyhoff, L. E., Edara, V. V., Floyd, K., De Rosa, S. C., Ahmed, H., Whaley, R., Patel, S. N., Prigmore, B., Lemos, M. P., Davis, C. W., Furth, S., O’Keefe, J. B., Gharpure, M. P., Gunisetty, S., Stephens, K., Antia, R., Zarnitsyna, V. I., Stephens, D. S., Edupuganti, S., Rouphael, N., Anderson, E. J., Mehta, A. K., Wrammert, J., Suthar, M. S., Ahmed, R., & McElrath, M. J.
Affiliations
  • Fred Hutch Cancer Center (US)
  • Emory University (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
  • Ahmed, Rafi
  • McElrath, M. Juliana
Venue
Cell Reports Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-07
Volume
2
Issue
7
Pages
100354
ISSN
2666-3791 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3178772652
Cited by
441
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 52 · 2024: 57 · 2023: 112 · 2022: 159 · 2021: 49
FWCI
29.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cell Reports Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • medRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • ImmPort
Funders
  • Georgia Research Alliance
  • National Institutes of Health (U19AI090023, 1U54CA260563, UM1AI069481-14S1, UM1AI068618-14S1, ORIP/OD P51OD011132, U19AI057266-17S1, T32AI074492, UM1A057266-S1)
  • Children's Healthcare of Atlanta
  • Paul G Allen Family Foundation (12931)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immune responses and vaccinations
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
Keywords
SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 pandemic, immunological memory, neutralizing antibodies, spike protein, antibody half-life, plasma cells, memory B cells, memory T cells, CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, cross-reactive antibodies, SARS-CoV-1, betacoronaviruses, nucleocapsid protein, vaccine design, long-term immunity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review