Major complications of airway management in the UK: results of the Fourth National Audit Project of the Royal College of Anaesthetists and the Difficult Airway Society. Part 1: anaesthesia
Open accessAbstract
Background This project was devised to estimate the incidence of major complications of airway management during anaesthesia in the UK and to study these events. Methods Reports of major airway management complications during anaesthesia (death, brain damage, emergency surgical airway, unanticipated intensive care unit admission) were collected from all National Health Service hospitals for 1 yr. An expert panel assessed inclusion criteria, outcome, and airway management. A matched concurrent census estimated a denominator of 2.9 million general anaesthetics annually. Results Of 184 reports meeting inclusion criteria, 133 related to general anaesthesia: 46 events per million general anaesthetics [95% confidence interval (CI) 38-54] or one per 22,000 (95% CI 1 per 26-18,000). Anaesthesia events led to 16 deaths and three episodes of persistent brain damage: a mortality rate of 5.6 per million general anaesthetics (95% CI 2.8-8.3): one per 180,000 (95% CI 1 per 352-120,000). These estimates assume that all such cases were captured. Rates of death and brain damage for different airway devices (facemask, supraglottic airway, tracheal tube) varied little. Airway management was considered good in 19% of assessable anaesthesia cases. Elements of care were judged poor in three-quarters: in only three deaths was airway management considered exclusively good. Conclusions Although these data suggest the incidence of death and brain damage from airway management during general anaesthesia is low, statistical analysis of the distribution of reports suggests as few as 25% of relevant incidents may have been reported. It therefore provides an indication of the lower limit for incidence of such complications. The review of airway management indicates that in a majority of cases, there is 'room for improvement'.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Wire-guided approaches are not as easy or successful as once believed.
“However, recent reviews have shown that complications associated with jet ventilation are unacceptably high and wire-guided approaches are not as easy or successful as once believed.[114][115][116][117]”
From Airway Management in Trauma (2018) · cites this paper as [116]
The Emergency surgical airway section (page unavailable) reports that 12 of 19 narrow-bore and 3 of 7 wide-bore cannula cricothyroidotomy attempts failed. The Discussion (page unavailable) calls the high failure rate concerning, but the paper does not identify those attempts as wire-guided or assess whether wire-guided approaches were once thought easier or more successful. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredComplications associated with jet ventilation are unacceptably high.
“However, recent reviews have shown that complications associated with jet ventilation are unacceptably high and wire-guided approaches are not as easy or successful as once believed.[114][115][116][117]”
From Airway Management in Trauma (2018) · cites this paper as [116]
The Emergency surgical airway and Discussion sections report a high failure rate for cannula cricothyroidotomy, but do not identify those attempts as jet ventilation or assess jet-ventilation complications. Searches for “jet ventilation” and “trans-tracheal jet ventilation” found no passage addressing the attributed claim. (LLM, conf=0.70)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 25
- Utting JE. Pitfalls in anaesthetic practice. Anaesthesia 1987; 59: 877-90
- Gannon K. Mortality associated with anaesthesia. A case review study. Anaesthesia 1991; 46: 962-6
- Cook TM, Scott S, Mihai R. Litigation related to airway and respir- atory complications of anaesthesia: an analysis of claims against the NHS in England 1995-2007. Anaesthesia 2010; 65: 556-63
- Caplan RA, Posner KL, Ward RJ, Cheney FW. Adverse respiratory events in anesthesia: a closed claims analysis. Anesthesiology 1990; 72: 828-33
- Gene N, Peterson GN, Domino KB, Lee MLA, Cheney FW. Manage- ment of the difficult airway. A closed claims analysis. Anesthesiol- ogy 2005; 103: 33-9
- Special Article. Practice guidelines for management of the diffi- cult airway. An updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on the Management of the Difficult Airway. Anesthesiology 2003; 98: 1269-77
- Brennan TA, Leape LL, Laird NM, et al. Incidence of adverse events and negligence in hospitalized patients. Results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study I. New Engl J Med 1991; 324: 370-6
- Studdert DM, Thomas EJ, Burstin HR, Zbar BI, Orav EJ, Brennan TA. Negligent care and malpractice claiming behavior in Utah and Colorado. Med Care 2000; 38: 250-60
- Smith AF, Mahajan RP. National critical incident reporting: improv- ing patient safety. Br J Anaesth 2009; 103: 623-5
- Cook TM, Woodall N, Harper J, Benger J. Major complications of airway management in the UK: results of the Fourth National Audit Project of the Royal College of Anaesthetists and the Diffi- cult Airway Society. Part 2: intensive care and emergency depart- ments. Br J Anaesth 2011; 106: 632-42
- Cook TM, Counsell D, Wildsmith JAW. On behalf of the Royal College of Anaesthetists Third National Audit Project. Major com- plications of central neuraxial block: report on the 3rd National Audit Project of the Royal College of Anaesthetists. Br J Anaesth 2009; 102: 179-90
- Woodall NM, Cook TM. A national census of airway management techniques employed during anaesthesia in the UK: results of the first phase of the 4th National Audit Project at the Royal College of Anaesthetists. Br J Anaesth 2011; 106: 266-71 13 Seven Steps to Patient Safety: A Guide for NHS Staff. National Patient Safety Agency, 2004. Available from http://www.nrls .npsa.nhs.uk/resources/?entryid45=59787 (accessed December 26, 2010)
- Caplan RA, Posner KL, Cheney FW. Effect of outcome on physician judgements of appropriateness of care. J Am Med Assoc 1991; 265: 1957-60
- McLaughlan C. Royal College of Anaesthetists census report 2007. Bull R Coll Anaesth 2008; 50: 2577-8. Available from http://www. rcoa.ac.uk/docs/Censusreport-final.pdf
- Auroy A, Benhamou D, Pe ´quignot F, Bovet M, Jougla E, Lienhart A. Mortality related to anaesthesia in France: analysis of deaths related to airway complications. Anaesthesia 2009; 64: 366-70
- Li G, Warner M, Lang BH, Lin H, Sun LS. Epidemiology of anesthesia-related mortality in the United States, 1999-2005. Anesthesiology 2009; 110: 759-65
- Tuffin R, Quinn A, Ali F, Cramp P. A review of the accuracy of death certification on the intensive care unit and the proposed reforms to the Coroner's system. J Intensive Care Soc 2009; 10: 134-7 20
- Domino KB, Posner KL, Caplan RA, Cheney FW. Airway injury during anaesthesia. Anesthesiology 1999; 91: 1703-11 21 Statistics on obesity physical activity and diet: England, 2010. The Health and Social Care Information Centre, 2010. ISBN:978-1-84636-382-5. Available from http://www.ic.nhs.uk/ webfiles/publications/opad10/Statistics_on_Obesity_Physical_ Activity_and_Diet_England_2010.pdf (accessed January 2, 2011)
- Kheterpal S, Han R, Tremper KK, et al. Incidence and predictors of difficult and impossible mask ventilation. Anesthesiology 2006; 105: 885-91 23
- Kristensen MS. Airway management and morbid obesity. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2010; 27: 923-7
- Farmery AD, Roe PG. A model to describe the rate of oxy- haemoglobin desaturation during apnoea. Br J Anaesth 1996; 76: 284-91
- Olsson GL, Hallen B, Hambraeus-Jonzon K. Aspiration during anaesthesia: a computer-aided study of 185,358 anaesthetics. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1986; 30: 84-92
- Harrison GG. Death attributable to anaesthesia. A 10-year survey (1967-1976). Br J Anaesth 1978; 50: 1041-6 28
- Tiret L, Nivoche Y, Hatton F, Desmonts JM, Vourc'h G. Complications related to anaesthesia in infants and children. A prospective survey of 40 240 anaesthetics. Br J Anaesth 1988; 61: 263-9
- Crosby E. Medical malpractice and anesthesiology: literature review and role of the expert witness. Can J Anaesth 2007; 54: 227-41
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kovacs, G., & Sowers, N. (2018) · Emergency Medicine Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.emc.2017.08.006 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
Effect of simulation‐based team training in airway management: a systematic review
Nielsen, R. P., Nikolajsen, L., Paltved, C., & Aagaard, R. (2021) · Anaesthesia · doi:10.1111/anae.15375 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Developing an intervention around referral and admissions to intensive care: a mixed-methods study
Bassford, C., Griffiths, F., Svantesson, M., Ryan, M., Krucien, N., Dale, J., Rees, S., Rees, K., Ignatowicz, A., Parsons, H., et al. (2019) · Health Services and Delivery Research · doi:10.3310/hsdr07390 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Simulation-Based Teaching and Learning in Respiratory Care Education: A Narrative Review
Sreedharan, J., Gopalakrishnan, G., Jose, A., Albalawi, I., Alkhathami, M., Satheesan, K., Alnasser, M., AlEnezi, M., & Alqahtani, A. (2024) · Advances in Medical Education and Practice · doi:10.2147/amep.s464629 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
- Authors
- Cook, T. M., Woodall, N., & Frerk, C.
- Affiliations
- Royal United Hospital (GB)
- Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
- Northampton General Hospital (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Cook, T.M.
- ORCID
- Cook, T.M.
- Venue
- British Journal of Anaesthesia
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-05
- Volume
- 106
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 617-631
- ISSN
- 0007-0912 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2106709024
- Cited by
- 2,415
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 194 · 2025: 179 · 2024: 182 · 2023: 173 · 2022: 150 · 2021: 190 · 2020: 167 · 2019: 159 · 2018: 157 · 2017: 150 · 2016: 208 · 2015: 122 · 2014: 133 · 2013: 93 · 2012: 102
- FWCI
- 159.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- British Journal of Anaesthesia (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Royal College of Anaesthetists
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Airway Management and Intubation Techniques
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Patient Safety and Medication Errors
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
- Keywords
- airway management complications, general anesthesia, brain damage, emergency surgical airway, intensive care unit admission, airway devices, supraglottic airway devices, endotracheal tube, face masks, underreporting of adverse events
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Airway Obstruction, Anesthesia, General, Hypoxia, Brain, Child, Emergencies, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Intensive Care Units, Male, Medical Audit, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, State Medicine, Airway Management
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review