Cited by 53Airway Management and Intubation TechniquesTracheal and airway disordersTrauma Management and Diagnosis

Systematic review of the anaesthetic management of non-iatrogenic acute adult airway trauma

Open access
Mercer, S.J., Jones, C.P., Bridge, M., Clitheroe, E., Morton, B., Groom, P.·2016·British Journal of Anaesthesia

Abstract

Introduction Non-iatrogenic trauma to the airway is rare and presents a significant challenge to the anaesthetist. Although guidelines for the management of the unanticipated difficult airway have been published, these do not make provision for the 'anticipated' difficult airway. This systematic review aims to inform best practice and suggest management options for different injury patterns. Methods A literature search was conducted using Embase, Medline, and Google Scholar for papers after the year 2000 reporting on the acute airway management of adult patients who suffered airway trauma. Our protocol and search strategy are registered with and published by PROSPERO (http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO, ID: CRD42016032763). Results A systematic literature search yielded 578 articles, of which a total of 148 full-text papers were reviewed. We present our results categorized by mechanism of injury: blunt, penetrating, blast, and burns. Conclusions The hallmark of airway management with trauma to the airway is the maintenance of spontaneous ventilation, intubation under direct vision to avoid the creation of a false passage, and the avoidance of both intermittent positive pressure ventilation and cricoid pressure (the latter for laryngotracheal trauma only) during a rapid sequence induction. Management depends on available resources and time to perform airway assessment, investigations, and intervention (patients will be classified into one of three categories: no time, some tim…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/bja/aew193

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For patients with known or suspected airway injury, the safest way to facilitate ETI is placement of the ETT under direct visualization, ideally from the oropharynx to the carina using an FIE.

    “For patients with known or suspected airway injury, the safest way to facilitate ETI is placement of the ETT under direct visualization, ideally from the oropharynx to the carina using an FIE.68,70”

    From Airway Management in Trauma (2018) · cites this paper as [68]

  • Practitioners have infrequent or limited experience in managing patients with primary airway trauma and existing management guidelines for care of these patients are mostly based on expert opinion.

    “practitioners have infrequent or limited experience in managing these patients and existing management guidelines for care of these patients are mostly based on expert opinion.68”

    From Airway Management in Trauma (2018) · cites this paper as [68]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mercer, S. J., Jones, C. P., Bridge, M., Clitheroe, E., Morton, B., & Groom, P.
Affiliations
  • University of Liverpool (GB)
  • Aintree University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine (GB)
Venue
British Journal of Anaesthesia
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-09
Volume
117
Pages
i49-i59
ISSN
0007-0912 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2511390194
Cited by
53
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1
FWCI
0.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal of Anaesthesia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LSTM Online Archive (Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine) (acceptedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
  • Edge Hill University Research Information Repository (Edge Hill University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Airway Management and Intubation Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Tracheal and airway disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Trauma Management and Diagnosis
Keywords
airway injury, anesthetic management, anticipated difficult airway, unanticipated difficult airway, blast injury, airway burns, laryngotracheal injury, rapid sequence induction, intermittent positive pressure ventilation, cricoid pressure, shared mental models, patient safety
MeSH terms
Anesthesia, General, Burns, Humans, Intubation, Intratracheal, Larynx, Respiratory System, Trachea, Wounds, Nonpenetrating, Wounds, Penetrating, Airway Management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review