The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Frequency of surgical treatment and related hospital procedures in the UK: a national ecological study using hospital episode statistics
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Despite evidence of high activity, the number of surgical procedures performed in UK hospitals, their cost and subsequent mortality remain unclear. METHODS: Time-trend ecological study using hospital episode data from England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. The primary outcome was the number of in-hospital procedures, grouped using three increasingly specific categories of surgery. Secondary outcomes were all-cause mortality, length of hospital stay and healthcare costs according to standard National Health Service tariffs. RESULTS: Between April 1, 2009 and March 31, 2014, 39 631 801 surgical patient episodes were recorded. There was an annual average of 7 926 360 procedures (inclusive category), 5 104 165 procedures (intermediate category) and 1 526 421 procedures (restrictive category). This equates to 12 537, 8073 and 2414 procedures per 100 000 population per year, respectively. On average there were 85 181 deaths (1.1%) within 30 days of a procedure each year, rising to 178 040 deaths (2.3%) after 90 days. Approximately 62.8% of all procedures were day cases. Median length of stay for in-patient procedures was 1.7 (1.3-2.0) days. The total cost of surgery over the 5 yr period was £54.6 billion ($104.4 billion), representing an average annual cost of £10.9 billion (inclusive), £9.5 billion (intermediate) and £5.6 billion (restrictive). For each category, the number of procedures increased each year, while mortality decreased. One-third of all mortalities in national death registers occurred within 90 days of a procedure (inclusive category). CONCLUSIONS: The number of surgical procedures in the UK varies widely according to definition. The number of procedures is slowly increasing whilst the number of deaths is decreasing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Age of patients undergoing surgery
Fowler, A. J., Abbott, T. E. F., Prowle, J., & Pearse, R. M. (2019) · British Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1002/bjs.11148 · Cited by 417
Self-citationAbbott, T. E. F., Pearse, R. M., Archbold, R. A., Ahmad, T., Niebrzegowska, E., Wragg, A., Rodseth, R. N., Devereaux, P. J., & Ackland, G. L. (2018) · Anesthesia & Analgesia · doi:10.1213/ane.0000000000002560 · Cited by 265
Self-citationPeden, C. J., Stephens, T., Martin, G., Kahan, B. C., Thomson, A., Rivett, K., Wells, D., Richardson, G., Kerry, S., Bion, J., et al. (2019) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(18)32521-2 · Cited by 189
Self-citationKnight, S. R., Ng, N., Tsanas, A., Mclean, K., Pagliari, C., & Harrison, E. M. (2021) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-021-00525-1 · Cited by 104
Metadata
- Authors
- Abbott, T. E. F., Fowler, A. J., Dobbs, T. D., Harrison, E. M., Gillies, M. A., & Pearse, R. M.
- Venue
- British Journal of Anaesthesia
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-08
- Volume
- 119
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 249-257
- ISSN
- 0007-0912 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2739863360
- Cited by
- 248
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 30.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Frequency of surgical treatment and related hospital procedures in the UK: a national ecological study using hospital episode statistics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/bja/aex137
- The paper
- Abbott, T. E. F., Fowler, A. J., Dobbs, T. D., Harrison, E. M., Gillies, M. A., & Pearse, R. M. (2017). Frequency of surgical treatment and related hospital procedures in the UK: a national ecological study using hospital episode statistics. British Journal of Anaesthesia. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aex137
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.