Intraocular pressure
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The normal range for intraocular pressure is reportedly 7-21 mmHg, and daily fluctuations in intraocular pressure can show an approximate range of 3-7 mmHg.
“The normal range for IOPs is reportedly 7–21 mmHg, and daily fluctuations in IOP can show an approximate range of 3–7 mmHg [22–25].”
From Bimatoprost for Eyelash Growth in Japanese Subjects: Two Multicenter Controlled Studies (2014) · cites this paper as [23]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bimatoprost for Eyelash Growth in Japanese Subjects: Two Multicenter Controlled Studies
Harii, K., Arase, S., Tsuboi, R., Weng, E., Daniels, S., & VanDenburgh, A. (2014) · Aesthetic Plastic Surgery · doi:10.1007/s00266-014-0293-7 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
- Authors
- Murgatroyd, H., & Bembridge, J.
- Affiliations
- Airedale General Hospital (GB)
- Bradford Royal Infirmary (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Bembridge, Jane
- Venue
- Continuing Education in Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-06
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 100-103
- ISSN
- 1472-2615 (ISSN-L)
- 1743-1816
- OpenAlex
- W4210593859
- Cited by
- 156
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 97 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4
- FWCI
- 0.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Continuing Education in Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Glaucoma and retinal disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
- Keywords
- intraocular pressure
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
