Cited by 41Sexual Assault and Victimization StudiesStalking, Cyberstalking, and HarassmentIntimate Partner and Family Violence

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Polyvictimization and the Continuum of Sexual Abuse at a College Campus: Does Negative Peer Support Increase the Likelihood of Multiple Victimizations?

Abstract

Although there is now a large literature on physical and sexual assaults at institutions of higher education, this article expands that knowledge by looking at Kelly’s continuum of sexual violence and the concept of polyvictimization. On a campus where 44.9 per cent of the women reported stalking, and 61.4 per cent reported sexual harassment, this article looks at women who were the victims of repeated or diverse types of abuse, ranging from obscene phone calls to stalking to harassment to penetrative sexual assault. Women who suffered multiple abuses are studied using data from the Campus Quality of Life Survey conducted at a large residential college in the South Atlantic part of the US negative peer support, and especially having friends that are abusive was found to increase the likelihood of multiple victimization.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/bjc/azy036

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 72

  1. Administrator-Researcher Campus Climate Collaborative (ARC3), 2015, ARC3 Campus Climate Survey Regarding Sexual Misconduct
  2. Agnich, 2018, Gender-Based Violence in Schools’, 159, 10.4135/9781483399591.n9 · DOI
  3. Alexander, 2018, Polyvictimization and Sexual Risk Behaviors in College-Aged Women’, Criminal Justice Review XXIX, 1
  4. Alvi, 2001, Women’s Fear of Crime in Canadian Public Housing’, Violence Against Women, 7, 638, 10.1177/10778010122182640 · DOI
  5. Black, 2011, The National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey (NISVS): 2010 Summary Report
  6. Bliss, 1934, ‘The Method of Probits, Science, 79, 38, 10.1126/science.79.2037.38 · DOI
  7. Center for Research on Violence Against Women, 2014, Campus Attitudes Toward Safety (C.A.T.S.) Survey
  8. Chan, 2015, Family Polyvictimization and Elevated Levels of Addiction and Psychopathology in a Chinese Household Sample’, Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 32, 2433, 10.1177/0886260515592617 · DOI
  9. Coker, 2011, Evaluation of Green Dot: an Active Bystander Intervention to Reduce Sexual Violence on College Campuses’, Violence Against Women, 17, 777, 10.1177/1077801211410264 · DOI
  10. Coker, 2014, Evaluation of the Green Dot Bystander Intervention to Reduce Interpersonal Violence Among College Students Across Three Campuses’, ViolenceAgainst Women, 17, 1
  11. Couper, 2010, Internet Surveys’, 527
  12. DeKeseredy, 1988, Woman Abuse in Dating Relationships: The Relevance of Social Support Theory, Journal of Family Violence, 3, 1, 10.1007/BF00994662 · DOI
  13. 1988, Woman Abuse in Dating Relationships: The Role of Male Peer Support
  14. 2017, Explaining Campus Violence Against Women: Unhealthy Masculinity and Male Peer Support’, 65
  15. DeKeseredy, 2017, Abusive Endings: Separation and Divorce Violence Against Women, 10.1525/california/9780520285743.001.0001 · DOI
  16. DeKeseredy, 2017, College Campus Sexual Assault: The Contribution of Peers’ Pro-Abuse Informational Support and Attachments to Abusive Peers’, Violence Against Women
  17. DeKeseredy, 2017, A Campus LGBTQ Community’s Sexual Violence and Stalking Experiences: The Contribution of Pro-Abuse Peer Support’, Journal of Gender-Based Violence, 1, 169, 10.1332/239868017X15099845241783 · DOI
  18. DeKeseredy, 1991, Woman Abuse: Sociological Perspectives
  19. DeKeseredy, 1998, Woman Abuse on Campus: Results from the Canadian National Survey
  20. 2009, Dangerous Exits: Escaping Abusive Relationships in Rural America
  21. 2013, Male Peers Support and Violence Against Women: The History and Verification of A Theory
  22. 2016, Thinking Sociologically About Image-Based Sexual Abuse: The Contribution of Male Peer Support Theory’, Sexualization, Media & Society, 2, 1
  23. Dobash, 1988, Research as Social Action: The Struggle for Battered Women’, 28
  24. Duffy, 1997, Family Violence: A Canadian Introduction
  25. Espelage, 2016, Recollections of Childhood Bullying and Multiple Forms of Victimization: Correlates with Psychological Functioning Among College Students, Social Psychology of Education, 19, 715, 10.1007/s11218-016-9352-z · DOI
  26. Fedina, 2016, Campus Sexual Assault: A Systematic Review of Prevalence Research from 2000 to 2015’, Trauma, Violence, and Abuse, 19, 76, 10.1177/1524838016631129 · DOI
  27. Fontes, 2015, Invisible Chains: Overcoming Coercive Control in Your Intimate Relationship
  28. Fox, 2011, Is Stalking a Learned Phenomenon?’, Journal of Criminal Justice, 39, 39, 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2010.10.002 · DOI
  29. Gil, 2015, Elder Abuse in Portugal, Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect, 27, 174, 10.1080/08946566.2014.953659 · DOI
  30. Glaspell, 1920, Plays
  31. Glick, 1996, The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating Hostile and Benevolent Sexism, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491, 10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.491 · DOI
  32. Gwartney-Gibbs, 1989, Courtship Aggression and Mixed-Sex Peer Groups’, 185
  33. Hamby, 2013, The Web of Violence: Exploring Connections Among Different Forms of Interpersonal Violence and Abuse, 10.1007/978-94-007-5596-3 · DOI
  34. Hamby, 2016, Poly-Victimization and Resilience Portfolios: Trends in Violence Research That Can Enhance the Understanding and Prevention of Elder Abuse’, Journal of Elder Abuse and Neglect, 28, 217, 10.1080/08946566.2016.1232182 · DOI
  35. Hamby, 2018, From Poly-Victimization to Poly-Strengths: Understanding the Web of Violence Can Transform Research on Youth Violence and Illuminate the Path to Prevention and Resilience’, Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 33, 719, 10.1177/0886260517744847 · DOI
  36. Hart, 2009, Future directions for BIPs: Examining the Power of Male Peer Support and Building Alternatie Support Communities
  37. Henriksen, 2016, Mandatory Bystander Intervention Training: Is the Save Act Requirement the “Right” Program to Reduce Violence Among College Students, 169
  38. Hewitt, 2014, Sexual Crime and Place: The Impact of the Environmental Context on Sexual Assault Outcomes’, Journal of Criminal Justice, 42, 375, 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2014.05.003 · DOI
  39. Holt, 2017, A Latent Class Analysis of Past Victimization Exposures as Predictors of College Mental Health’, Psychology of Violence, 7, 521, 10.1037/vio0000068 · DOI
  40. James, 1990, The Effect of Monetary Incentives and Follow-Up Mailings on the Response Rate and Response Quality in Mail Surveys’, Public Opinion Quarterly, 54, 346, 10.1086/269211 · DOI
  41. Kelly, 1987, The Continuum of Sexual Violence’, 46, 10.1007/978-1-349-18592-4_4 · DOI · Paper page
  42. 1988, Surviving Sexual Violence
  43. Brown, 2012, Standing the Test of Time? Reflections on the Concept of the Continuum of Violence’, xvii
  44. Kelly, 1987, The Problem of Men: Feminist Perspectives on Sexual Violence’, 237
  45. Kernsmith, 2008, Coercive Control’, 133, 10.4135/9781412963923.n88 · DOI
  46. Kirkwood, 1993, Leaving Abusive Partners
  47. Klein, 2012, The Bully Society: School Shootings and the Crisis of Bullying in America’s Schools
  48. Koss, 2007, Revising the SES: A Collaborative Process to Improvement Assessment of Sexual Aggression and Victimization’, Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31, 357, 10.1111/j.1471-6402.2007.00385.x · DOI · Paper page
  49. McGlynn, 2017, Beyond “revenge porn”: The Continuum of Image-Based Sexual Abuse, Feminist Legal Studies, 10.1007/s10691-017-9343-2 · DOI · Paper page
  50. Melton, 2007, Predicting the Occurrence of Stalking in Relationships Characterized by Domestic Violence’, Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 22, 13, 10.1177/0886260506294994 · DOI
  51. Miller, 2008, Getting Played: African-American Girls, Urban Inequality, and Gendered Violence’
  52. Morgan, 2008, Sexual Harassment’, 661
  53. Navarro, 2016, Cyberabuse and Cyberstalking’, 125
  54. Pedersen, 2016, Improving Survey Response Rates in Online Panels: Effects of Low-Cost Incentives and Cost-Free Text Appeal Interventions’, Social Science Computer Review, 34, 229, 10.1177/0894439314563916 · DOI
  55. Phoenix, 2012, ‘Violence and Prostitution: Beyond the Notion of a “continuum of sexual violence’”, 218
  56. Pitts, 1997, Self-Blame in Hidden Rape Cases’, 65, 10.4135/9781483327907.n5 · DOI
  57. Powell, 2017, Sexual Violence in a Digital Age, 10.1057/978-1-137-58047-4 · DOI · Paper page
  58. Powers, 2017, Intimate Partner Violence on College Campuses’, 35
  59. Pritchard, Who Speaks First? Analyzing Response Waves in a Large-Scale Campus Climate Survey’, Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment and Trauma
  60. Ptacek, 2016, Rape and the Continuum of Sexual Abuse in Intimate Relationships: Interviews with U.S. Women from Different Social Classes’, 123, 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190238360.003.0009 · DOI
  61. Ramsey-Klawsnik, 2017, Older Adults Affected by Polyvictimization’, Journal of Elder Abuse and Neglect, 29, 299, 10.1080/08946566.2017.1388019 · DOI
  62. Richards, 2016, An Updated Review of Institutions of Higher Education’s Responses to Sexual Assault: Results from a Nationally Representative Sample’, Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 10.1177/0886260516658757 · DOI
  63. Schwartz, 1997, Sexual Assault on the College Campus: The Role of Male Peer Support, 10.4135/9781452232065 · DOI
  64. Schwartz, 1995, Exploring a Feminist Routine Activities Approach to Examining Sexual Assault’, Justice Quarterly, 12, 9, 10.1080/07418829500092551 · DOI
  65. Sibley, 2007, When Women Become More Hostilely Sexist Toward Their Gender: The System-Justifying Effect of Benevolent Sexism’, Sex Roles, 51, 687, 10.1007/s11199-004-0718-x · DOI
  66. Smith, 1987, The Incidence and Prevalence of Woman Abuse in Toronto’, Violence and Victims, 2, 173, 10.1891/0886-6708.2.3.173 · DOI
  67. Tanha, 2010, Sex Differences in Intimate Partner Violence and the Use of Coercive Control as a Motivational Factor for Intimate Partner Violence’, Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 10, 1836, 10.1177/0886260509354501 · DOI
  68. Walklate, 2012, Conclusion: Taking stock’, 485
  69. Weiss, 2013, Party School: Crime, Campus, and Community
  70. Wolfe, 2018, Why Polyvictimization Matters’, Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 33, 832, 10.1177/0886260517752215 · DOI
  71. Wood, 2017, Climate Surveys: An Inventory of Understanding Sexual Assault and Other Crimes of Interpersonal Violence at Institutions of Higher Education’, Violence Against Women, 23, 1228, 10.1177/1077801216657897 · DOI
  72. Wooten, 2016, Introduction, 1, 10.4324/9781315537856 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 41

Metadata

Authors
DeKeseredy, W. S., Schwartz, M. D., Nolan, J., Mastron, N., & Hall-Sanchez, A.
Affiliations
  • West Virginia University (US)
  • George Washington University (US)
  • Fairmont State University (US)
Corresponding author
DeKeseredy, Walter S
Venue
The British Journal of Criminology
Published
2018-08-28
Volume
59
Issue
2
Pages
276-295
ISSN
  • 0007-0955 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-3529
OpenAlex
W2888930366
Cited by
41
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7
FWCI
6.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The British Journal of Criminology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
Keywords
polyvictimization, campus sexual assault, stalking, sexual harassment, female students, multiple victimization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review