Corrigendum to: Hate in the Machine: Anti-Black and Anti-Muslim Social Media Posts as Predictors of Offline Racially and Religiously Aggravated Crime
Open accessAbstract
Brit J Criminol doi:10.1093/bjc/azz049 The authors regret that summary statistics reported in the original published version were incorrect. All summary statistics, including figures 4–7, have been corrected in the online and print version of the paper.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
El discurso de odio en redes sociales se asocia con consecuencias tangibles en el mundo real, como el incremento de delitos de odio dirigidos hacia comunidades vulnerables.
“Estas manifestaciones de odio no solo afectan al ámbito digital, sino que, según se ha demostrado ampliamente, se asocian con consecuencias tangibles en el mundo real, como el incremento de delitos de odio dirigidos hacia estas comunidades (Müller & Schwarz, 2020;Wiedlitzka et al., 2021;Williams et al., 2020).”
From Redes de odio y contranarrativas en Twitter sobre el ataque a iglesias católicas en Algeciras: Dinámicas de conectividad, influencia y polarización (2026) · cites this paper as Williams et al., 2020
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Rebollo Diaz, C. (2026) · Redes. Revista hispana para el análisis de redes sociales · doi:10.5565/rev/redes.1130
- Authors
- Williams, M. L., Burnap, P., Javed, A., Liu, H., & Ozalp, S.
- Venue
- The British Journal of Criminology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2019-09-19
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 242-242
- ISSN
- 0007-0955 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-3529
- OpenAlex
- W2973806433
- Cited by
- 119
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 6
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- The British Journal of Criminology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Economic and Social Research Council (ES/P010695/1)
- U.S. Department of Justice (2016-MU-MU-0009)
- National Institute of Justice
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
- Keywords
- hate speech, anti-Black racism, anti-Muslim racism, social media posts
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
