Cited by 80Philosophy, Science, and HistoryPhilosophy and History of ScienceEpistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics

Comment on Lockwood

Deutsch, David·1996·The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/bjps/47.2.222

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Deutsch, D.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Deutsch, David
Venue
The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science
Published
1996-06-01
Volume
47
Issue
2
Pages
222-228
ISSN
  • 0007-0882 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-3537
OpenAlex
W2332929001
Cited by
80
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
19.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy, Science, and History
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy and History of Science
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review