AN OUTLINE OF GENERAL SYSTEM THEORY
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The ontological pillar of IST connects the paradigm of systemic family research to general systems theory and cybernetics, which serve to describe the interaction between people.
“The ontological pillar of IST connects the paradigm of systemic family research to GST (von Bertalanffy, 1950(von Bertalanffy, , 1968) and cybernetics (Wiener & von Neumann, 1949), which serve to describe the interaction between people.”
From Researching what we practice—The paradigm of systemic family research: Part 2 (2023) · cites this paper as von Bertalanffy, 1950
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ghisellini, P., Cialani, C., & Ulgiati, S. (2016) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007 · Cited by 6,536 · see citing works
Murray, A., Skene, K., & Haynes, K. (2017) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-015-2693-2 · Cited by 3,328 · see citing works
The application of AI technologies in STEM education: a systematic review from 2011 to 2021
Xu, W., & Ouyang, F. (2022) · International Journal of STEM Education · doi:10.1186/s40594-022-00377-5 · Cited by 495 · see citing works
Bibri, S. E. (2018) · Sustainable Cities and Society · doi:10.1016/j.scs.2017.12.032 · Cited by 273 · see citing works
Synchronous failure: the emerging causal architecture of global crisis
Homer-Dixon, T., Walker, B., Biggs, R., Crépin, A.-S., Folke, C., Lambin, E. F., Peterson, G. D., Rockström, J., Scheffer, M., Steffen, W., et al. (2015) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-07681-200306 · Cited by 244 · see citing works
The ICF Model of Functioning and Disability: Incorporating Quality of Life and Human Development
McDougall, J., Wright, V., & Rosenbaum, P. (2010) · Developmental Neurorehabilitation · doi:10.3109/17518421003620525 · Cited by 199 · see citing works
Beyond the organizational ‘container’: Conceptualizing 21st century sociotechnical work
Winter, S., Berente, N., Howison, J., & Butler, B. (2014) · Information and Organization · doi:10.1016/j.infoandorg.2014.10.003 · Cited by 178 · see citing works
Models and Data Sources Used in Systems Medicine: A Systematic Literature Review
Löpprich, M., Karmen, C., Ganzinger, M., & Gietzelt, M. (2016) · Methods of Information in Medicine · doi:10.3414/me15-01-0151 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Researching what we practice—The paradigm of systemic family research: Part 2
Whittaker, K., Stokkebekk, J., Lorås, L., & Tilden, T. (2023) · Family Process · doi:10.1111/famp.12921 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
- Authors
- BERTALANFFY, L. V.
- Corresponding author
- BERTALANFFY, LUDWIG VON
- Venue
- The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1950-08-01
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 134-165
- ISSN
- 0007-0882 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-3537
- OpenAlex
- W2071900848
- Cited by
- 1,845
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 82 · 2025: 87 · 2024: 66 · 2023: 107 · 2022: 95 · 2021: 99 · 2020: 100 · 2019: 84 · 2018: 75 · 2017: 63 · 2016: 103 · 2015: 110 · 2014: 88 · 2013: 94 · 2012: 72
- FWCI
- 153.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy and History of Science
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Systems and Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Complex Systems and Decision Making
- Keywords
- general systems theory, systems theory, philosophy of systems
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
