Cited by 20Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationGlobal Health and SurgerySurgical Simulation and Training

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Artificial intelligence in surgery: a global balancing act

Open access
Kewalramani, Divya, Loftus, Tyler J, Mayol, Julio, Narayan, Mayur·2024·British Journal of Surgery

Abstract

In the contemporary landscape of surgery, artificial intelligence (AI) plays markedly different roles across the global economic spectrum, offering solutions that range from reactive to predictive. In affluent nations, AI applications are predominantly predictive, proactively addressing potential health issues before they manifest. Conversely, in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), as highlighted by Muir Gray, urgent challenges like unwarranted variability in surgical quality, harm, resource waste, inequity and lack of prevention prevail1. These issues necessitate a strategic shift in AI application towards reactive solutions that directly address these immediate and critical surgical concerns. This dichotomy underscores the need for a strategic realignment of AI applications in surgery, moving beyond collaborative efforts to include major transformations in business models, surgical culture and technology. This article describes a comprehensive approach to aligning technology with the diverse needs of the global population, thus fostering a more balanced and responsive global surgical ecosystem. Emerging AI techniques show promise across the surgical value chain, from self-service educational tools for community health to computer-assisted intraoperative and postoperative care. Additionally, AI’s role in administrative tasks like resource planning and inventory management could streamline healthcare services. The early deployment of AI in surgery should focus on enhancing patient outcomes and increasing access in underserved areas. These multifaceted applications, however, hinge on governance that ensures equitable adoption and practical integration2. Prioritizing these actions lays the groundwork for systemic healthcare reform underpinned by transparent and altruistic Global North–South partnerships.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/bjs/znae062

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Kewalramani, D., Loftus, T. J., Mayol, J., & Narayan, M.
Affiliations
  • Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh (US)
  • University of Florida (US)
  • Universidad Complutense de Madrid (ES)
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
Corresponding author
Kewalramani, Divya
Venue
British Journal of Surgery
Published
2024-03
Volume
111
Issue
3
ISSN
  • 0007-1323 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2168
OpenAlex
W4393166134
Cited by
20
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 1
FWCI
1.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British journal of surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Global Health and Surgery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Surgical Simulation and Training
Keywords
artificial intelligence in surgery, low- and middle-income countries, global health equity, surgical training, computer-assisted surgery, postoperative care, healthcare resource planning, AI governance, access to surgical care
MeSH terms
Artificial Intelligence, Humans, General Surgery

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review