Cited by 53

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Preoperative multimodal prehabilitation before elective colorectal cancer surgery in patients with WHO performance status I or II: randomized clinical trial

Bojesen, Rasmus Dahlin, Dalton, Susanne Oksbjerg, Skou, Søren Thorgaard, Jørgensen, Lars Bo, Walker, Line Rosell, Eriksen, Jens Ravn, Grube, Camilla, Justesen, Tobias Freyberg, Johansen, Christoffer, Slooter, Gerrit, Carli, Franco, Gögenur, Ismail·2023·BJS Open

Abstract

Background: Multimodal prehabilitation is a promising adjunct to the current surgical treatment pathway for colorectal cancer patients to further improve postoperative outcomes, especially for high-risk patients with low functional capacity. The aim of the present study was to test the effect of prehabilitation on immediate postoperative recovery. Method: The study was designed as a RCT with two arms (intervention and control). The intervention consisted of 4 weeks of multimodal prehabilitation, with supervised physical training, nutritional support and medical optimization. The control group received standard of care. A total of 40 patients with colorectal cancer (WHO performance status I or II) undergoing elective surgery with curative intent were included. The primary outcome was postoperative recovery within the first 3 postoperative days, measured by Quality of Recovery-15, a validated questionnaire with a scoring range between 0 and 150 and a minimal clinically relevant difference of 8. Results: In total, 36 patients were analysed with 16 in the intervention group and 20 in the control group. The mean age of the included patients was 79 years. The overall treatment effect associated with the intervention was a 21.9 (95% c.i. 4.5–39.3) higher quality of recovery-15 score during the first 3 postoperative days compared to control, well above the minimal clinically relevant difference. Conclusion: Four weeks of multimodal prehabilitation prior to elective curative intended colorectal cancer surgery in patients with WHO performance status I or II was associated with a clinically relevant improvement in postoperative recovery. Registration number: NCT04167436 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/bjsopen/zrad134

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Metadata

Authors
Bojesen, R. D., Dalton, S. O., Skou, S. T., Jørgensen, L. B., Walker, L. R., Eriksen, J. R., Grube, C., Justesen, T. F., Johansen, C., Slooter, G., Carli, F., & Gögenur, I.
Venue
BJS Open
Published
2023-11-01
Volume
7
Issue
6
ISSN
2474-9842
Cited by
53
References
5
Language
en
Funders
  • Axel Muusfeldts Foundation
  • Dagmar Marshall Foundation
  • Einar Willumsen Scholarship Foundation
  • Beckett Foundation
  • Region Zealand
  • Horizon 2020 research and innovation
  • European Research Council (801790, 945377)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review