Cited by 499Social Work Education and PracticeStress and Burnout ResearchChild Welfare and Adoption

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 66 of the 66 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Resilience and Burnout in Child Protection Social Work: Individual and Organisational Themes from a Systematic Literature Review

Open access
McFadden, Paula, Campbell, Anne, Taylor, Brian·2015·British Journal of Social Work

Abstract

Child protection social work is acknowledged as a very stressful occupation, with high turnover and poor retention of staff being a major concern. This paper highlights themes that emerged from findings of sixty-five articles that were included as part of a systematic literature review. The review focused on the evaluation of research findings, which considered individual and organisational factors associated with resilience or burnout in child protection social work staff. The results identified a range of individual and organisational themes for staff in child protection social work. Nine themes were identified in total. These are categorised under ‘Individual’ and ‘Organisational’ themes. Themes categorised as individual included personal history of maltreatment, training and preparation for child welfare, coping, secondary traumatic stress, compassion fatigue and compassion satisfaction. Those classified as organisational included workload, social support and supervision, organisational culture and climate, organisational and professional commitment, and job satisfaction or dissatisfaction. The range of factors is discussed with recommendations and areas for future research are highlighted.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/bjsw/bct210

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 66 references

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Aclaro-Lapidario M. L. (2007) ‘Coping strategies of children's social workers in the Department of Children and Family Services (California)’, Masters Abstracts International, 46 (02), pp. 0730.
  2. Caringi J. C. (2008) ‘Secondary traumatic stress in New York State child welfare workers’, Dissertation Abstracts International, A: The Humanities and Social Sciences, 68 (10), pp. 565–574
  3. Munro E. (2011) Munro Review of Child Protection: A Child Centred System, May 2011 , Department for Education, London.
  4. Robichaud C. M. (2004) ‘The relationship of spirituality and coping to burnout in child welfare workers’, Dissertation Abstracts International, A: The Humanities and Social Sciences, 65 (3), p. 1122-A.
  5. Shepel L. M. (2009) ‘Potential triple jeopardy: A descriptive cross-sectional study of the impact of vicarious traumatisation and secondary traumatic stress on Aboriginal child welfare social workers’, Dissertation Abstracts International, A: The Humanities and Social Sciences, 69 (11), pp. 4508.
  6. Song K. (2006) ‘Prevalence of client violence toward child and family social workers and its effects on burnout, organizational commitment, and turnover intention: A structural equation modelling approach’, Dissertation Abstracts International, A: The Humanities and Social Sciences, 66 (9), p. 3465-A.
  7. Turcotte D. Pouliot E. (2006) ‘Job satisfaction of social workers in child protection’, Canadian Social Work, 8 (1), pp. 32–41
  8. Vu P. H. (2007) ‘Perceived coping strategies of children's social workers in dealing with vicarious trauma’, Masters Abstracts International, 45 (05), pp. 2280.
  9. Weuste M. B. (2006) ‘Critical incident stress and debriefing of child welfare workers’, Dissertation Abstracts International, A: The Humanities and Social Sciences, 66 (7), p. 2727-A.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 401–498 of 498

Metadata

Authors
McFadden, P., Campbell, A., & Taylor, B.
Affiliations
  • University of Ulster (GB)
  • Queen's University Belfast (GB)
Corresponding author
McFadden, Paula
Venue
British Journal of Social Work
Published
2014-02-26
Volume
45
Issue
5
Pages
1546-1563
ISSN
  • 0045-3102 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-263X
OpenAlex
W2138865191
Cited by
499
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 44 · 2025: 69 · 2024: 67 · 2023: 53 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 45 · 2019: 60 · 2018: 44 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 8
FWCI
14.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The British Journal of Social Work (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Public Administration › Social Work Education and Practice
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Child Welfare and Adoption
Keywords
child protection social work, resilience, burnout, occupational stress, employee turnover, employee retention, secondary traumatic stress, compassion fatigue, compassion satisfaction, coping, workload, social support, supervision, organizational culture, job satisfaction, professional commitment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review