Cited by 61Health disparities and outcomesPublic Health and Social InequalitiesHealthcare Systems and Public Health

Health inequalities are worsening in the North East of England

Open access
Corris, Valerie, Dormer, Emily, Brown, Andrea, Whitty, Paula, Collingwood, Paul, Bambra, Clare, Newton, Julia L·2020·British Medical Bulletin

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The North of England, particularly the North East (NE), has worse health (e.g. 2 years lower life expectancy) and higher health inequalities compared to the rest of England. SOURCES OF DATA: We explore this over time drawing on publicly available data. AREAS OF AGREEMENT AND CONTROVERSY: Whilst overall health is improving, within-regional health inequalities are getting worse and the gap between the NE and other regions (particularly the South of England) is worsening. The gap in life expectancy is widening with substantial variation between deprived and affluent areas within the NE. Those living in the NE are more likely to have a shorter lifespan and to spend a larger proportion of their shorter lives in poor health, as well as being more likely to die prematurely from preventable diseases. GROWING POINTS: We highlight wide, and in some cases increasing, inequalities in health outcomes between the NE and the rest of England. This health disadvantage and the north-south health divide are recognized; despite this, the situation appears to be worsening over the time. AREAS TIMELY FOR DEVELOPING RESEARCH: Research to understand and reduce health inequalities is needed particularly in the NE of England where reductions could have enhanced the impact.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/bmb/ldaa008

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [2]The Northern Powerhouse Independent Economic Review 2016 https://www.transportforthenorth.com/wp-content/uploads/Northern-Powerhouse-Independent-Economic-Review-Executive-Summary.pdf (12 March 2019, date last accessed).
  2. [4]https://www.health.org.uk/news-and-comment/news/health-equity-in-england-the-marmot-review-10-years-on?gclid=EAIaIQobChMIyfChrJ2Q6AIVjsjeCh2NHw2kEAAYASAAEgLzb_D_BwE (12 March 2019, date last accessed).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Corris, V., Dormer, E., Brown, A., Whitty, P., Collingwood, P., Bambra, C., & Newton, J. L.
Affiliations
  • NEQOS, North East Quality Observatory Service, 1st Floor, Ridley House, Henry Street, Gosforth, Newcastle upon Tyne NE3 1DQ, UK
  • University of Nottingham (GB)
  • Cumbria Northumberland Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Corresponding author
Newton, Julia L
Venue
British Medical Bulletin
Published
2020-05-28
Volume
134
Issue
1
Pages
63-72
ISSN
  • 0007-1420 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-8391
OpenAlex
W3030046543
Cited by
61
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6
FWCI
3.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Medical Bulletin (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity) (cc-by-nc)
Funders
National Institute for Health Research
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Health › Public Health and Social Inequalities
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Healthcare Systems and Public Health
Keywords
health disparities, North East England, life expectancy, regional health disparities, deprivation, premature mortality, preventable diseases, health disadvantage
MeSH terms
England, Health Services Needs and Demand, Humans, Life Expectancy, Health Status Disparities, Healthcare Disparities, Social Determinants of Health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review