The DOI matches its Crossref record.
THE ROLE OF CUTANEOUS AFFERENTS IN POSITION SENSE, KINAESTHESIA, AND MOTOR FUNCTION OF THE HAND
Abstract
In reconstructive surgery and rehabilitation work, for decades it has been a basic problem for the author to discover which of the peripheral receptor systems provide the primary information on position, motion and degree of load (proprioception). At one time, joint receptors were accepted as the dominant source and more recently musculocutaneous receptors, whereas little attention has been given to cutaneous factors. A number of clinical observations, however, have indicated the importance of cutaneous afferents and this prompted the present study. There are no means of isolating the joint receptors in order to test them alone, but the fact that very good kinaesthesia can be present in their absence militates against their importance. The cutaneous and musculotendinous factors were therefore studied independently in the forearm and hand in test subjects, partly by means of an extensive nerve blocking technique, but also in experiments of the type devised by Gelfan and Carter (1967). The latter proved to be much less simple than had earlier been claimed. The results of the experiments indicated that no kinaesthetic information reaching conscious level could be shown to arise from the musculocutaneous system, whereas the cutaneous afferents appeared to provide the dominant input. As this system can be readily examined and can be moved surgically to parts in need of proprioception, the practical consequences are obvious. It was also observed that signals arising from skin that is displaced over contracting muscle bellies or moving tendons remote from the activated parts of the limb could constitute an important source of error, overlooked in earlier studies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Somatosensory processes subserving perception and action
Dijkerman, H. C., & de Haan, E. H. F. (2007) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x07001392 · Cited by 614
Prediction of stroke outcome with echoplanar perfusion- and diffusion-weighted MRI
Barber, P. A., Darby, D. G., Desmond, P. M., Yang, Q., Gerraty, R. P., Jolley, D., Donnan, G. A., Tress, B. M., & Davis, S. M. (1998) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.51.2.418 · Cited by 559
Does the nervous system use equilibrium-point control to guide single and multiple joint movements?
Bizzi, E., Hogan, N., Mussa-Ivaldi, F. A., & Giszter, S. (1992) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00072538 · Cited by 465
Cutaneous Receptors Contribute to Kinesthesia at the Index Finger, Elbow, and Knee
Collins, D. F., Refshauge, K. M., Todd, G., & Gandevia, S. C. (2005) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00191.2005 · Cited by 416
Does the nervous system depend on kinesthetic information to control natural limb movements?
Gandevia, S. C., & Burke, D. (1992) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x0007254x · Cited by 359
Metadata
- Authors
- MOBERG, E.
- Venue
- Brain
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1983
- Volume
- 106
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-19
- ISSN
- 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2156
- OpenAlex
- W2118093139
- Cited by
- 189
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: THE ROLE OF CUTANEOUS AFFERENTS IN POSITION SENSE, KINAESTHESIA, AND MOTOR FUNCTION OF THE HAND. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/brain/106.1.1
- The paper
- MOBERG, E. (1983). THE ROLE OF CUTANEOUS AFFERENTS IN POSITION SENSE, KINAESTHESIA, AND MOTOR FUNCTION OF THE HAND. Brain. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/106.1.1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.