The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Prediction of stroke outcome with echoplanar perfusion- and diffusion-weighted MRI
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: We examined the utility of echoplanar magnetic resonance perfusion imaging and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in predicting stroke evolution and outcome in 18 patients with acute hemispheric infarction. METHODS: Patients were studied within 24 hours (mean, 12.2 hours), subacutely (mean, 4.7 days), and at outcome (mean, 84 days). Comparisons were made between infarction volumes as measured on perfusion imaging (PI) and isotropic DWI maps, clinical assessment scales (Canadian Neurological Scale, Barthel Index, and Rankin Scale), and final infarct volume (T2-weighted MRI). RESULTS: Acute PI lesion volumes correlated with acute neurologic state, clinical outcome, and final infarct volume. Acute DWI lesions correlated less robustly with acute neurologic state, but correlated well with clinical outcome and final infarct volume. Three of six possible patterns of abnormalities were seen: PI lesion larger than DWI lesion (65%), PI lesion smaller than DWI lesion (12%), and DWI lesion but no PI lesion (23%). A pattern of a PI lesion larger than the DWI lesion predicted DWI expansion into surrounding hypoperfused tissue (p < 0.05). In the other two patterns, DWI lesions did not enlarge, suggesting that no significant increase in ischemic lesion size occurs in the absence of a larger perfusion deficit. CONCLUSIONS: Combined early PI and DWI can define different acute infarct patterns, which may allow the selection of rational therapeutic strategies based on the presence or absence of potentially salvageable ischemic tissue.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Assessment [RETIRED]: Magnetoencephalography (MEG)
(1992) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.42.1.1 · Cited by 232
Cited by
Higashida, R. T., & Furlan, A. J. (2003) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.0000082721.62796.09 · Cited by 1,543
Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging of the Brain
Schaefer, P. W., Grant, P. E., & Gonzalez, R. G. (2000) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiology.217.2.r00nv24331 · Cited by 1,052
Hillis, A. E., Newhart, M., Heidler, J., Barker, P. B., Herskovits, E. H., & Degaonkar, M. (2005) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.4468-04.2005 · Cited by 323
Merino, J. G., & Warach, S. (2010) · Nature Reviews Neurology · doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2010.129 · Cited by 152
An Overview of Acute Stroke Therapy: Past, Present, and Future
Fisher, M., & Schaebitz, W. (2000) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.160.21.3196 · Cited by 112
Metadata
- Authors
- Barber, P. A., Darby, D. G., Desmond, P. M., Yang, Q., Gerraty, R. P., Jolley, D., Donnan, G. A., Tress, B. M., & Davis, S. M.
- Venue
- Neurology
- Published
- 1998-08
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 418-426
- ISSN
- 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-632X
- OpenAlex
- W2006440647
- Cited by
- 559
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 37.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prediction of stroke outcome with echoplanar perfusion- and diffusion-weighted MRI. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1212/wnl.51.2.418
- The paper
- Barber, P. A., Darby, D. G., Desmond, P. M., Yang, Q., Gerraty, R. P., Jolley, D., Donnan, G. A., Tress, B. M., & Davis, S. M. (1998). Prediction of stroke outcome with echoplanar perfusion- and diffusion-weighted MRI. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.51.2.418
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.