The DOI matches its Crossref record.
ANALYSIS OF CEREBELLAR MOTOR DISORDERS BY VISUALLY GUIDED ELBOW TRACKING MOVEMENT
Abstract
Motor control was analysed by a visuomotor tracking movement using elbow flexion both in patients with cerebellar ataxia and in normal controls. A TV screen was divided into upper and lower halves, in each of which a vertical strip was displayed. The upper strip (T, target) was moved horizontally from the centre of the screen to the left or right by ramp voltage. The lower strip (D, displacement of the handle) was moved in proportion to angular displacement of the handle by a potentiometer coupled to the handle axis. The subject, while sitting in front of the TV screen, had to make D match the movement of T by controlling the handle with his right arm. The range of T movement was 30 deg in terms of the handle's angular movement. T velocity was 7.5, 15 or 30 deg/s. The subjects were told the direction and velocity of T in advance. The process of tracking was divided into three phases (initial catch-up phase, middle pursuit phase, and terminal phase), in each of which the performance of cerebellar ataxia patients differed from that of the controls. The characteristic features of the ataxic cases were (1) prolongation of the reaction time, mainly due to the increase of premotor time; (2) difficulty in selecting an appropriate amplitude of initial peak velocity in proportion to the target velocity in the initial catch-up phase; (3) disruption of smooth continuous movement, namely, the saccadic pattern in the middle pursuit phase; (4) delay in the initiation of deceleration in the terminal phase; (5) difficulty in corrective adjustment in reaching the final target point; and (6) irregular EMG activity in the agonist muscles and/or cocontraction of the antagonistic muscles. Quantitative treatment of the second and third features, as exemplified in the relationship between initial error and initial peak velocity and in the ratio of the movement arrest period, respectively, was found to be helpful in the evaluation of disease severity. The significance of these findings is discussed and the role of the cerebellar system in the control of slow voluntary movement is stressed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Learning to predict the future: the cerebellum adapts feedforward movement control
Bastian, A. J. (2006) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.conb.2006.08.016 · Cited by 678
Does the nervous system use equilibrium-point control to guide single and multiple joint movements?
Bizzi, E., Hogan, N., Mussa-Ivaldi, F. A., & Giszter, S. (1992) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00072538 · Cited by 465
Sensitivity of Smoothness Measures to Movement Duration, Amplitude, and Arrests
Hogan, N., & Sternad, D. (2009) · Journal of Motor Behavior · doi:10.3200/35-09-004-rc · Cited by 440
Does the nervous system depend on kinesthetic information to control natural limb movements?
Gandevia, S. C., & Burke, D. (1992) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x0007254x · Cited by 359
The representation of egocentric space in the posterior parietal cortex
Stein, J. F. (1992) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00072605 · Cited by 339
Metadata
- Authors
- BEPPU, H., SUDA, M., & TANAKA, R.
- Venue
- Brain
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1984
- Volume
- 107
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 787-809
- ISSN
- 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2156
- OpenAlex
- W2046630819
- Cited by
- 189
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ANALYSIS OF CEREBELLAR MOTOR DISORDERS BY VISUALLY GUIDED ELBOW TRACKING MOVEMENT. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/brain/107.3.787
- The paper
- BEPPU, H., SUDA, M., & TANAKA, R. (1984). ANALYSIS OF CEREBELLAR MOTOR DISORDERS BY VISUALLY GUIDED ELBOW TRACKING MOVEMENT. Brain. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/107.3.787
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.