Cited by 678Motor Control and AdaptationMemory and Neural MechanismsVestibular and auditory disorders

Learning to predict the future: the cerebellum adapts feedforward movement control

Bastian, Amy J·2006·Current Opinion in Neurobiology

Abstract

The role of the cerebellum in motor control and learning has been largely inferred from the effects of cerebellar damage. Recent work shows that cerebellar damage produces greater impairment of movements that require predictive as opposed to reactive control. This dissociation is consistent across many different types of movement. Predictive control is crucial for fast and ballistic movements, but impaired prediction can also affect slow movements, because of increased reliance on time-delayed feedback signals. The new findings are compatible with theories of cerebellar function, but still do not resolve whether the cerebellum operates by predicting the optimal motor commands or future sensory states. Prediction mechanisms must be learned and maintained through comparisons between predicted and observed outcomes. New results show that not all such error information is equivalent in driving cerebellar learning.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.conb.2006.08.016

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A wide range of previous studies converge to the cerebellum processes as the loci of internal forward models.

    “A wide range of previous studies converge to the cerebellum processes as the loci of internal forward models”

    From The Cerebro-Cerebellum as a Locus of Forward Model: A Review (2020) · cites this paper as Bastian, 2006

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bastian, A. J.
Affiliations
Kennedy Krieger Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Bastian, Amy J
Venue
Current Opinion in Neurobiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-12
Volume
16
Issue
6
Pages
645-649
ISSN
0959-4388 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2127934730
Cited by
678
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 49 · 2019: 55 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 40 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 40 · 2013: 35 · 2012: 27
FWCI
1.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Neurobiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD040289, HD-040289, HD04741)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vestibular and auditory disorders
Keywords
cerebellum, predictive control, cerebellar lesions, motor learning, error signal, delayed feedback, ballistic movements, cerebellar function
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Physiological, Animals, Cerebellar Ataxia, Cerebellum, Feedback, Humans, Learning, Movement, Neural Pathways, Psychomotor Performance, Volition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review