The DOI matches its Crossref record.
NONHAEMORRHAGIC THALAMIC INFARCTION: CLINICAL, NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL AND ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL FINDINGS IN FOUR ANATOMICAL GROUPS DEFINED BY COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY
Abstract
Twenty-five patients with nonhaemorrhagic infarcts of the thalamus were studied clinically and by neuropsychological testing, computerized tomography and somatosensory evoked response (SER) recordings. Our aim was to determine whether the findings in these different tests would form distinct symptom clusters associated with different anatomical territories of the thalamus. Infarction conforming to the tuberothalamic arterial territory caused a facial paresis for emotional movements, severe neuropsychological deficits and a delay of the SER after P14. Infarction conforming to the interpeduncular profundus arterial territory caused a supranuclear vertical gaze paresis, severe neuropsychological deficits and a delay in the P60 component of the SER. Infarction conforming to the anterior choroidal territory caused a hemiparesis, moderate neuropsychological deficits and varied sensory evoked responses. Patients with infarctions conforming to the entire geniculothalamic territory had sensory loss in multiple modalities, minimal neuropsychological deficits and absence of sensory evoked responses after P14. A lacune in this territory caused pure hemisensory loss involving part of the body for the modalities of pain and light touch but not proprioception or vibration. Neuropsychological deficits were uncommon and N32 and N60 were delayed in the SER.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The subcortical anatomy of human spatial neglect: putamen, caudate nucleus and pulvinar
Karnath, H., Himmelbach, M., & Rorden, C. (2002) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awf032 · Cited by 476
Executive Dysfunction and the Prefrontal Cortex
Jones, D. T., & Graff-Radford, J. (2021) · Continuum · doi:10.1212/con.0000000000001009 · Cited by 256
The Anatomy of Spatial Neglect in Humans
Vallar, G., & Perani, D. (1987) · Advances in Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0166-4115(08)61716-1 · Cited by 140
Strategic infarcts of the thalamus in vascular dementia
Szirmai, I., Vastagh, I., Szombathelyi, É., & Kamondi, A. (2002) · Journal of the Neurological Sciences · doi:10.1016/s0022-510x(02)00273-3 · Cited by 76
Coma and Related Global Disturbances of the Human Conscious State
Plum, F. (1991) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-6622-9_9 · Cited by 68
Metadata
- Authors
- GRAFF-RADFORD, N. R., DAMASIO, H., YAMADA, T., ESLINGER, P. J., & DAMASIO, A. R.
- Venue
- Brain
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1985
- Volume
- 108
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 485-516
- ISSN
- 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2156
- OpenAlex
- W2519563667
- Cited by
- 296
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: NONHAEMORRHAGIC THALAMIC INFARCTION: CLINICAL, NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL AND ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL FINDINGS IN FOUR ANATOMICAL GROUPS DEFINED BY COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/brain/108.2.485
- The paper
- GRAFF-RADFORD, N. R., DAMASIO, H., YAMADA, T., ESLINGER, P. J., & DAMASIO, A. R. (1985). NONHAEMORRHAGIC THALAMIC INFARCTION: CLINICAL, NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL AND ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL FINDINGS IN FOUR ANATOMICAL GROUPS DEFINED BY COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY. Brain. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/108.2.485
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.