The DOI matches its Crossref record.
SYMPATHETIC ACTIVITY IN MAN AFTER SPINAL CORD INJURY: OUTFLOW TO MUSCLE BELOW THE LESION
Abstract
Microelectrode recordings were made in peroneal muscle nerve fascicles in 9 patients with traumatic spinal cord lesions at the C5 to T8 level. In 4 patients the lesion was incomplete with some sensibility but no voluntary motor function below the level of the lesion. All patients had increased tendon jerks. EMG was recorded in 5 patients and showed signs of some peripheral denervation. Simultaneous recordings from nerves to skin and to muscle were made in 2 patients and control recordings were made in 19 normal subjects. In the patients, spontaneous neural activity was sparse but after a latency of 0.5-1.1 s strong mechanical and electrical stimuli applied to the skin below the level of the lesion, stimulation of the urinary bladder and deep breaths induced bursts of efferent impulses with a conduction velocity of 0.65 m X s-1. The discharges were often followed by cutaneous vasoconstriction and/or reduction of skin resistance. It is concluded that the neural bursts contained sympathetic impulses of spinal origin. The main differences between patients and normal subjects were spontaneous muscle sympathetic activity was much lower in the patients; no evidence of arterial baroreflex modulation of muscle sympathetic activity was obtained in the patients; and in the patients a given stimulus induced sympathetic reflex discharges which occurred synchronously in muscle and skin nerve branches. Increases of intravesical pressure induced only weak increases of muscle sympathetic activity in the patients but nevertheless marked hypertensive reactions occurred. It is suggested that the excitability of decentralized spinal sympathetic neurons to muscles is usually decreased and that mechanisms other than exaggerated sympathetic outflow must be important for evoking episodes of high blood pressure in patients with spinal cord injuries.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sympathetic-Nerve Activity during Sleep in Normal Subjects
Somers, V. K., Dyken, M. E., Mark, A. L., & Abboud, F. M. (1993) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199302043280502 · Cited by 1,574
Human responses to upright tilt: a window on central autonomic integration
Cooke, W. H., Hoag, J. B., Crossman, A. A., Kuusela, T. A., Tahvanainen, K. U. O., & Eckberg, D. L. (1999) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7793.1999.0617t.x · Cited by 506
VanSomeren, E. J. W. (2000) · Chronobiology International · doi:10.1081/cbi-100101050 · Cited by 329
Wallin, B. G., Esler, M., Dorward, P., Eisenhofer, G., Ferrier, C., Westerman, R., & Jennings, G. (1992) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1992.sp019217 · Cited by 298
Autonomic function following cervical spinal cord injury
Krassioukov, A. (2009) · Respiratory Physiology & Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.resp.2009.08.003 · Cited by 296
Metadata
- Authors
- STJERNBERG, L., BLUMBERG, H., & WALLIN, B. G.
- Venue
- Brain
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1986
- Volume
- 109
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 695-715
- ISSN
- 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2156
- OpenAlex
- W2169522209
- Cited by
- 232
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: SYMPATHETIC ACTIVITY IN MAN AFTER SPINAL CORD INJURY: OUTFLOW TO MUSCLE BELOW THE LESION. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/brain/109.4.695
- The paper
- STJERNBERG, L., BLUMBERG, H., & WALLIN, B. G. (1986). SYMPATHETIC ACTIVITY IN MAN AFTER SPINAL CORD INJURY: OUTFLOW TO MUSCLE BELOW THE LESION. Brain. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/109.4.695
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.