The DOI matches its Crossref record.
INCLUSION BODY MYOSITIS: OBSERVATIONS IN 40 PATIENTS
Abstract
Inclusion body myositis (IBM) was suspected on light microscopic grounds in 48 of 170 consecutive patients with inflammatory myopathies. One or more vacuoles containing membranous material, groups of atrophic fibres, and an autoaggressive endomysial inflammatory exudate occurred in 100, 96 and 92% of the muscle specimens. All three of these features were present in 88% of the specimens. Electron microscopy confirmed the presence of filamentous inclusions in 40 of 43 patients. The inclusions are typically near vacuoles and a minimum of three vacuolated fibres must be scrutinized to detect them with confidence. There is no electromyographic pattern that can reliably distinguish IBM from other inflammatory myopathies. The typical clinical features in the patients diagnosed by histological criteria as IBM were: insidious onset after age 50 yrs with painless, proximal lower extremity weakness; slow but relentless progression with selectively severe involvement of quadriceps, iliopsoas, tibialis anterior, biceps and triceps muscles; relatively early depression of the knee reflexes; and a normal or mildly elevated serum creatine kinase level. The male: female ratio was 3:1. Distal weakness occurred in about 50%, but only in 35% was it as great or greater than proximal weakness. Significant associated illnesses include other autoimmune disorders (15%), diabetes mellitus (20%), and diffuse peripheral neuropathy (18%). Prednisone treatment at dose levels frequently effective in polymyositis failed to prevent disease progression in those patients observed for 2 or more years. Our findings support the notion that IBM is a distinct entity in which a set of pathological features is associated with a constellation of clinical findings.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
El Escorial revisited: revised criteria for the diagnosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
Brooks, B. R., Miller, R. G., Swash, M., & Munsat, T. L. (2000) · Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Other Motor Neuron Disorders · doi:10.1080/146608200300079536 · Cited by 5,433
How citation distortions create unfounded authority: analysis of a citation network
Greenberg, S. A. (2009) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.b2680 · Cited by 499
Review article: the gastrointestinal complications of myositis
EBERT, E. C. (2010) · Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2036.2009.04190.x · Cited by 113
Rare variants in SQSTM1 and VCP genes and risk of sporadic inclusion body myositis
Gang, Q., Bettencourt, C., Machado, P. M., Brady, S., Holton, J. L., Pittman, A. M., Hughes, D., Healy, E., Parton, M., Hilton-Jones, D., et al. (2016) · Neurobiology of Aging · doi:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2016.07.024 · Cited by 51
Sporadic inclusion body myositis: possible pathogenesis inferred from biomarkers.
Weihl, C. C., & Pestronk, A. (2010) · Current Opinion in Neurology · doi:10.1097/wco.0b013e32833d3897 · Cited by 51
Metadata
- Authors
- LOTZ, B. P., ENGEL, A. G., NISHINO, H., STEVENS, J. C., & LITCHY, W. J.
- Venue
- Brain
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1989
- Volume
- 112
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 727-747
- ISSN
- 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2156
- OpenAlex
- W2040157223
- Cited by
- 573
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.