The DOI matches its Crossref record.
PROCESSING OF LOCAL AND GLOBAL MUSICAL INFORMATION BY UNILATERAL BRAIN-DAMAGED PATIENTS
Abstract
Melody processing in unilaterally brain-damaged patients was investigated by manipulating the availability of contour and metre for discrimination in melodies varying, respectively, on the pitch dimension and the temporal dimension. On the pitch dimension, right brain-damaged patients, in contrast to left brain-damaged patients and normal controls, were found to be little affected by the availability of contour as a discrimination cue. However, both brain-damaged groups were impaired on tasks requiring consideration of pitch interval structure. These findings are consistent with hierarchical contribution of the cerebral hemispheres, with the right hemisphere being primary in representing the melody in terms of its global contour and the left hemisphere by filling in the intervallic structure. On the temporal dimension, only the discrimination of durational values (the rhythm) was found to be impaired by a lesion in either hemisphere, which spared, however, the metric interpretation of the musical sequences. These latter results are discussed in the light of current models of temporal processing. Finally, evidence of double dissociation between the processing of the pitch dimension and the processing of rhythm was obtained, providing further support for the need to fractionate musical perceptual abilities in order to arrive at a theory as to how the two hemispheres cohere to produce a musical interpretation of the auditory input.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Brain Organization for Music Processing
Peretz, I., & Zatorre, R. J. (2005) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070225 · Cited by 863
Self-citationMusic and emotion: perceptual determinants, immediacy, and isolation after brain damage
Peretz, I. (1998) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/s0010-0277(98)00043-2 · Cited by 580
Self-citationAyotte, J., Peretz, I., & Hyde, K. (2002) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awf028 · Cited by 503
Self-citationPeretz, I., Ayotte, J., Zatorre, R. J., Mehler, J., Ahad, P., Penhune, V. B., & Jutras, B. (2002) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(01)00580-3 · Cited by 332
Self-citationShared and distinct neural correlates of singing and speaking
Özdemir, E., Norton, A., & Schlaug, G. (2006) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.07.013 · Cited by 323
Metadata
- Authors
- PERETZ, I.
- Venue
- Brain
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1990
- Volume
- 113
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1185-1205
- ISSN
- 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2156
- OpenAlex
- W2006618409
- Cited by
- 371
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: PROCESSING OF LOCAL AND GLOBAL MUSICAL INFORMATION BY UNILATERAL BRAIN-DAMAGED PATIENTS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/brain/113.4.1185
- The paper
- PERETZ, I. (1990). PROCESSING OF LOCAL AND GLOBAL MUSICAL INFORMATION BY UNILATERAL BRAIN-DAMAGED PATIENTS. Brain. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/113.4.1185
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.