Cited by 863Neuroscience and Music PerceptionNeurobiology of Language and BilingualismHemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience

Brain Organization for Music Processing

Peretz, Isabelle, Zatorre, Robert J.·2005·Annual Review of Psychology

Abstract

Research on how the brain processes music is emerging as a rich and stimulating area of investigation of perception, memory, emotion, and performance. Results emanating from both lesion studies and neuroimaging techniques are reviewed and integrated for each of these musical functions. We focus our attention on the common core of musical abilities shared by musicians and nonmusicians alike. Hence, the effect of musical training on brain plasticity is examined in a separate section, after a review of the available data regarding music playing and reading skills that are typically cultivated by musicians. Finally, we address a currently debated issue regarding the putative existence of music-specific neural networks. Unfortunately, due to scarcity of research on the macrostructure of music organization and on cultural differences, the musical material under focus is at the level of the musical phrase, as typically used in Western popular music.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070225

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Listening to music has the capacity to initiate a multitude of cognitive processes in the brain.

    “As listening to music has the capacity to initiate a multitude of cognitive processes in the brain [32]”

    From The Effect of Music on the Human Stress Response (2013) · cites this paper as [32]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Peretz, I., & Zatorre, R. J.
Affiliations
  • Université de Montréal (CA)
  • Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital (CA)
Venue
Annual Review of Psychology
Published
2005-02-01
Volume
56
Issue
1
Pages
89-114
ISSN
  • 0066-4308 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-2085
OpenAlex
W2168729844
Cited by
863
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 65 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 41 · 2017: 35 · 2016: 42 · 2015: 45 · 2014: 59 · 2013: 54 · 2012: 42
FWCI
1.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annual Review of Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience
Keywords
music processing, music perception, music memory, music and emotion, music performance, musical training, neuroplasticity, musicianship, music reading, musical phrases, Western popular music, lesion studies, neuroimaging
MeSH terms
Affect, Auditory Perception, Basal Ganglia, Brain, Cerebellum, Cognition, Humans, Memory, Music, Nerve Net, Pitch Perception, Time Perception, Recognition, Psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review