Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 544

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

CATEGORY-SPECIFIC NAMING AND COMPREHENSION IMPAIRMENT: A DOUBLE DISSOCIATION

HILLIS, ARGYE E., CARAMAZZA, ALFONSO·1991·Brain

Abstract

We describe 2 neurologically impaired patients with lesions involving primarily the left temporal lobe, whose production and comprehension of words in the semantic category of animals were disproportionately spared in 1 case and disproportionately impaired in the other, in comparison to performance with other common categories. This double dissociation provides neurally based evidence for the view that lexical-semantic information is organized categorically.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/brain/114.5.2081

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 544

Metadata

Authors
HILLIS, A. E., & CARAMAZZA, A.
Venue
Brain
Published
1991
Volume
114
Issue
5
Pages
2081-2094
ISSN
  • 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2156
OpenAlex
W2152490223
Cited by
544
References
1
FWCI
13.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: CATEGORY-SPECIFIC NAMING AND COMPREHENSION IMPAIRMENT: A DOUBLE DISSOCIATION. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/brain/114.5.2081
The paper
HILLIS, A. E., & CARAMAZZA, A. (1991). CATEGORY-SPECIFIC NAMING AND COMPREHENSION IMPAIRMENT: A DOUBLE DISSOCIATION. Brain. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/114.5.2081

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.