The DOI matches its Crossref record.
VISUOSPATIAL ATTENTION IN DEMENTIA OF THE ALZHEIMER TYPE
Abstract
Cue-directed shifts of spatial attention were examined for a letter-discrimination task in 15 patients with mild to moderate dementia of the Alzheimer type (DAT) and 15 healthy, age-matched controls. Spatial cues were valid, invalid or neutral in indicating probable target location and were presented either centrally at fixation or peripherally 6.7 degrees to the left or right of fixation. Stimulus-onset asynchrony (SOA) between cue and target was varied between 200 ms and 2000 ms. Reaction time (RT) benefits conferred by valid cues did not differ between the DAT group and the controls. However, RT costs incurred by invalid cues were significantly greater in the DAT group than in the control group. Group differences in RT costs plus benefits occurred at short SOAs (less than 500 ms) for peripheral cues and at long SOAs (greater than 500 ms) for central cues. Reaction time costs plus benefits were correlated with right-left asymmetry in resting levels of cerebral glucose metabolism in the superior parietal lobe for DAT patients but not for controls. The results indicate that focusing of attention to spatial location is intact in early DAT, whereas the disengagement of visuospatial attention is impaired. Automatic attention shifts elicited by peripheral cues reveal abnormalities earlier than attention shifts initiated 'effortfully' by central cues. Intact focusing and impaired disengagement of visuospatial attention may be linked to dysfunction in early DAT of cortico-cortical networks linking the posterior parietal and frontal lobes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Uncertainty, Neuromodulation, and Attention
Yu, A. J., & Dayan, P. (2005) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2005.04.026 · Cited by 1,774
Sarter, M., Hasselmo, M. E., Bruno, J. P., & Givens, B. (2005) · Brain Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.brainresrev.2004.08.006 · Cited by 667
Auld, D. S., Kornecook, T. J., Bastianetto, S., & Quirion, R. (2002) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/s0301-0082(02)00079-5 · Cited by 666
Hasselmo, M. E., & McGaughy, J. (2004) · Progress in Brain Research · doi:10.1016/s0079-6123(03)45015-2 · Cited by 525
Perry, R. J., Watson, P., & Hodges, J. R. (2000) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/s0028-3932(99)00079-2 · Cited by 494
Metadata
- Authors
- PARASURAMAN, R., GREENWOOD, P. M., HAXBY, J. V., & GRADY, C. L.
- Venue
- Brain
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1992
- Volume
- 115
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 711-733
- ISSN
- 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2156
- OpenAlex
- W1977041705
- Cited by
- 274
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: VISUOSPATIAL ATTENTION IN DEMENTIA OF THE ALZHEIMER TYPE. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/brain/115.3.711
- The paper
- PARASURAMAN, R., GREENWOOD, P. M., HAXBY, J. V., & GRADY, C. L. (1992). VISUOSPATIAL ATTENTION IN DEMENTIA OF THE ALZHEIMER TYPE. Brain. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/115.3.711
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.