Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 349

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

QUANTITATIVE SOMATOSENSORY THERMOTEST: A KEY METHOD FOR FUNCTIONAL EVALUATION OF SMALL CALIBRE AFFERENT CHANNELS

VERDUGO, RENATO, OCHOA, JOSÉ L.·1992·Brain

Abstract

The quantitative somatosensory thermotest (QST) assesses the function of afferent channels concerned with sensory submodalities served by small calibre fibres. Measured ramps of ascending or descending temperature are applied to the skin through a Peltier contact thermode, and detection thresholds are recorded as the subject signals the onset of a particular sensation. The present study describes underlying principles, methodological aspects and normal reference values for the QST. In patients, measurement of thresholds for cold sensation, warm sensation, cold-induced pain and heat-induced pain, applied to 465 individuals, yielded 13 abnormal patterns segregated into three main groups: (i) thermal (cold or warm) hypoaesthesia; (ii) thermal hyperalgesia (abnormally reduced threshold for cold and/or heat induced pain); (iii) thermal hypoaesthesia combined with thermal hyperalgesia. Critical analysis of these results yielded a number of observations of general relevance: (i) thermal specific (warm or cold) hypoaesthesia and thermal (heat or cold) hyperalgesia may occur in the absence of hypoaesthesia for tactile submodalities served by large calibre afferents; (ii) cold hypoaesthesia and warm hypoaesthesia may dissociate from each other; (iii) thermal pain hyperalgesias may occur in the absence of hypoaesthesias for specific cold or warm sensations; (iv) cold hyperalgesia and heat hyperalgesia may dissociate from each other. Thus, a negative routine sensory examination and unimpaired sensory nerve action potentials do not exclude possible somatosensory dysfunction. Furthermore, while most methods of sensory testing only document normality or deficit, the QST permits additional documentation of hyperalgesia, a positive sensory phenomenon that implies unusual pathophysiologies such as sensitization of receptors, central hyperexcitability, disinhibition or, possibly, ectopic nerve impulse discharge. This psychophysical test does not specify the level within afferent channels, between skin and brainmind, where the abnormality resides. It is recommended that the QST for all four thermal specific and thermal pain functions be incorporated in routine neurological assessment.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/brain/115.3.893

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 349

Metadata

Authors
VERDUGO, R., & OCHOA, J. L.
Venue
Brain
Published
1992
Volume
115
Issue
3
Pages
893-913
ISSN
  • 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2156
OpenAlex
W1990078084
Cited by
349
References
0
FWCI
4.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: QUANTITATIVE SOMATOSENSORY THERMOTEST: A KEY METHOD FOR FUNCTIONAL EVALUATION OF SMALL CALIBRE AFFERENT CHANNELS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/brain/115.3.893
The paper
VERDUGO, R., & OCHOA, J. L. (1992). QUANTITATIVE SOMATOSENSORY THERMOTEST: A KEY METHOD FOR FUNCTIONAL EVALUATION OF SMALL CALIBRE AFFERENT CHANNELS. Brain. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/115.3.893

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.