Cited by 221Reading and Literacy DevelopmentNeurobiology of Language and BilingualismVisual perception and processing mechanisms

THE TOPOGRAPHY OF CALLOSAL READING PATHWAYS: A CASE-CONTROL ANALYSIS

Abstract

Lesion topography and reading ability were analysed in 17 patients with dominant posterior cerebral artery territory infarction. Patients with dominant posterior cerebral artery infarction in whom reading was unaffected served as an anatomical control group. Normal readers had lesions in the medical and ventral occipital lobe, sparing dorsal white matter pathways and the ventral temporal lobe. Global and permanent alexia occurred only with additional injury to the splenium, forceps major or white matter above the occipital horn of the lateral ventricle. These data suggest that callosal pathways mediating reading lie above the occipital horn and have little connection with the ventromedial occipital region. Patients with ‘spelling dyslexia’ had large lesions of the ventral temporal lobe involving cortical regions believed to participate in later stages of visual processing. These findings provide a framework for the prediction of dyslexia type and severity based on lesion topography.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/brain/115.6.1807

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Selective damage to the left fusiform region impairs visual but not auditory word recognition.

    “Finally, converging neuropsychological evidence indicates that selective damage to the left fusiform region impairs visual but not auditory word recognition (Box 1).”
  • Pure alexia results in an impaired ability to read words in a rapid, parallel fashion.

    “Pure alexia (PA; also known as 'word form dyslexia' or 'letter-byletter reading') results in an impaired ability to read words in a rapid, parallel fashion [46,47].”
  • The locus of damage to the visual system leading to pure alexia coincides with the VWFA.

    “The locus of damage to the visual system leading to PA coincides with the Visual Word Form Area (VWFA) (see Fig. I).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

Cited by 221

Authors
BINDER, J. R., & MOHR, J. P.
Affiliations
Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
BINDER, J. R.
Venue
Brain
Published
1992
Volume
115
Issue
6
Pages
1807-1826
ISSN
  • 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2156
OpenAlex
W2236810300
Cited by
221
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 14
FWCI
1.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Brain (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (5T32NS07155-13)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Keywords
posterior cerebral artery infarction, lesion topography, corpus callosum, splenium, forceps major, occipital lobe, visual word recognition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review