THE TOPOGRAPHY OF CALLOSAL READING PATHWAYS: A CASE-CONTROL ANALYSIS
Abstract
Lesion topography and reading ability were analysed in 17 patients with dominant posterior cerebral artery territory infarction. Patients with dominant posterior cerebral artery infarction in whom reading was unaffected served as an anatomical control group. Normal readers had lesions in the medical and ventral occipital lobe, sparing dorsal white matter pathways and the ventral temporal lobe. Global and permanent alexia occurred only with additional injury to the splenium, forceps major or white matter above the occipital horn of the lateral ventricle. These data suggest that callosal pathways mediating reading lie above the occipital horn and have little connection with the ventromedial occipital region. Patients with ‘spelling dyslexia’ had large lesions of the ventral temporal lobe involving cortical regions believed to participate in later stages of visual processing. These findings provide a framework for the prediction of dyslexia type and severity based on lesion topography.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Selective damage to the left fusiform region impairs visual but not auditory word recognition.
“Finally, converging neuropsychological evidence indicates that selective damage to the left fusiform region impairs visual but not auditory word recognition (Box 1).”
From The visual word form area: expertise for reading in the fusiform gyrus (2003) · cites this paper as [47]
Pure alexia results in an impaired ability to read words in a rapid, parallel fashion.
“Pure alexia (PA; also known as 'word form dyslexia' or 'letter-byletter reading') results in an impaired ability to read words in a rapid, parallel fashion [46,47].”
From The visual word form area: expertise for reading in the fusiform gyrus (2003) · cites this paper as [47]
The locus of damage to the visual system leading to pure alexia coincides with the VWFA.
“The locus of damage to the visual system leading to PA coincides with the Visual Word Form Area (VWFA) (see Fig. I).”
From The visual word form area: expertise for reading in the fusiform gyrus (2003) · cites this paper as [47]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
Cited by 221
- Authors
- BINDER, J. R., & MOHR, J. P.
- Affiliations
- Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- BINDER, J. R.
- Venue
- Brain
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1992
- Volume
- 115
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1807-1826
- ISSN
- 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2156
- OpenAlex
- W2236810300
- Cited by
- 221
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 1.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Brain (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (5T32NS07155-13)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Keywords
- posterior cerebral artery infarction, lesion topography, corpus callosum, splenium, forceps major, occipital lobe, visual word recognition
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review