The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The significance of brain magnetic resonance imaging abnormalities at presentation with clinically isolated syndromes suggestive of multiple sclerosis: A 5-year follow-up study
Abstract
A 5-year follow-up study was performed on 89 patients who had undergone brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at presentation with an acute clinically isolated syndrome of the optic nerves, brainstem or spinal cord of a type suggestive of multiple sclerosis. At presentation, MRI was abnormal, revealing one or more asymptomatic cerebral white matter lesions in 57 (64%), and was normal in 32 (36%). At follow-up, progression to clinically definite multiple sclerosis had occurred in 37 out of 57 (65%) with an abnormal MRI and one out of 32 (3%) with normal MRI. Human leucocyte antigen (HLA) typing was performed in 70 patients and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) was examined at presentation in 36. The presence of HLA-DR2 antigen or cerebrospinal fluid oligoclonal IgG bands were both associated with a significantly increased risk of progression to multiple sclerosis, but MRI was much more powerful in predicting outcome. The presence of four or more MRI lesions at presentation was associated with a higher rate of progression to multiple sclerosis, more frequent development of moderate or severe disabilities and a greater number of new MRI lesions at follow-up. The results indicate that brain MRI at presentation with a clinically isolated syndrome suggestive of multiple sclerosis is a powerful predictor of the clinical course over the next 5 years. This observation, combined with an ability to detect other sometimes treatable disorders which can also cause such syndromes, suggests that MRI is the investigation of choice in evaluating this group of patients.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Defining the clinical course of multiple sclerosis: The 2013 revisions
Lublin, F. D., Reingold, S. C., Cohen, J. A., Cutter, G. R., Sørensen, P. S., Thompson, A. J., Wolinsky, J. S., Balcer, L. J., Banwell, B., Barkhof, F., et al. (2014) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000000560 · Cited by 3,177
Jacobs, L. D., Beck, R. W., Simon, J. H., Kinkel, R. P., Brownscheidle, C. M., Murray, T. J., Simonian, N. A., Slasor, P. J., & Sandrock, A. W. (2000) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm200009283431301 · Cited by 1,501
Barkhof, F. (1997) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/120.11.2059 · Cited by 1,251
Fisniku, L. K., Brex, P. A., Altmann, D. R., Miszkiel, K. A., Benton, C. E., Lanyon, R., Thompson, A. J., & Miller, D. H. (2008) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awm329 · Cited by 897
Self-citationA longitudinal study of abnormalities on MRI and disability from multiple sclerosis
Brex, P. A., Ciccarelli, O., O'Riordan, J. I., Sailer, M., Thompson, A. J., & Miller, D. H. (2002) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa011341 · Cited by 861
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Morrissey, S. P., Miller, D. H., Kendall, B. E., Kingsley, D. P. E., Kelly, M. A., Francis, D. A., MacManus, D. G., & McDonald, W. I.
- Venue
- Brain
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1993
- Volume
- 116
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 135-146
- ISSN
- 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2156
- OpenAlex
- W2177122475
- Cited by
- 360
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The significance of brain magnetic resonance imaging abnormalities at presentation with clinically isolated syndromes suggestive of multiple sclerosis: A 5-year follow-up study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/brain/116.1.135
- The paper
- Morrissey, S. P., Miller, D. H., Kendall, B. E., Kingsley, D. P. E., Kelly, M. A., Francis, D. A., MacManus, D. G., & McDonald, W. I. (1993). The significance of brain magnetic resonance imaging abnormalities at presentation with clinically isolated syndromes suggestive of multiple sclerosis: A 5-year follow-up study. Brain. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/116.1.135
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.