Spatial planning deficits in limb apraxia.
Abstract
Geschwind (1975) proposed a disconnection model in which an apraxic subject is unable to carry out movements to command because the left hemisphere that comprehended the verbal command is disconnected from the right premotor and motor areas which controls the left hand. An alternate model, however, proposes that apraxia results from destruction of spatiotemporal representations of learned movement stored in the left hemisphere (Heilman, 1979). The disconnection hypothesis would predict that apraxic subjects should be able to correctly imitate gestures and correctly use actual tools since these tasks do not require language. The movement representation model predicts that imitation and actual tool use would also be impaired. Motion analyses were performed on the trajectories of repetitive 'slicing' gestures made in a series of conditions in which contextual cues were introduced in a graded fashion. Four cue conditions were presented: no cues (verbal command), object present, tool present and both object and tool present. Positions of the hand, wrist, elbow, and shoulder were digitized from neighbouring views, reconstructed in three dimensions and analysed with respect to specific spatiotemporal features of the trajectories. Three subjects with limb apraxia, who had lesions that included left parietal cortex, and four neurologically intact subjects participated. The apraxic subjects showed disturbances in planning the movement of the hand in space across the cue conditions. For example, they showed deficits in the plane of motion, the shape of the trajectory and in the coupling of hand speed and trajectory shape even when given full contextual cues. These data support the hypothesis that apraxia can result from the destruction of spatiotemporal representations of learned movement, rather than from a disconnection between the receptive language areas in the left hemisphere and the contralateral motor cortices.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Patients with apraxia from PPC damage have difficulty generating pantomime performance of what one would stereotypically do with a hammer or comb, even though they can mimic the act when pantomimed by a model.
“Patients with apraxia resulting from damage to PPC have difficulty in generating pantomime performance of what one would stereotypically do with a hammer or comb (Clark et al., 1994), even though they can perfectly mimic the act when it is pantomimed by a model.”
From Impulsive action: emotional impulses and their control (2014) · cites this paper as Clark et al., 1994
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The mental representation of hand movements after parietal cortex damage
Sirigu, A., Duhamel, J.-R., Cohen, L., Pillon, B., Dubois, B., & Agid, Y. (1996) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.273.5281.1564 · Cited by 836 · see citing works
A distributed left hemisphere network active during planning of everyday tool use skills
Johnson-Frey, S. H., Newman-Norlund, R., & Grafton, S. T. (2005) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhh169 · Cited by 558 · see citing works
The left hemisphere and the selection of learned actions
Rushworth, M. F. S., Nixon, P. D., Wade, D. T., Renowden, S., & Passingham, R. E. (1998) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/s0028-3932(97)00101-2 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Impulsive action: emotional impulses and their control
Frijda, N. H., Ridderinkhof, K. R., & Rietveld, E. (2014) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00518 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
- Authors
- Clark, M. A., Merians, A. S., Kothari, A., Poizner, H., Macauley, B., Rothi, L. J. G., & Heilman, K. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey (US)
- Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
- University of Florida Health (US)
- Venue
- Brain
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1994
- Volume
- 117
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1093-1106
- ISSN
- 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2156
- OpenAlex
- W2128100802
- Cited by
- 135
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 1.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Brain (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (5r01dc001664-04, 1t32hd007417-01, 5r01ns028665-07)
- National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (DC01664)
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS28665)
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD07417)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Spatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction
- Keywords
- limb apraxia, spatial planning, spatio-temporal representation, motor planning, disconnection hypothesis, contextual cues, tool use, imitation
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Apraxias, Brain, Cues, Extremities, Female, Humans, Male, Motor Cortex, Movement, Neural Pathways, Psychomotor Performance, Spatial Behavior, Verbal Learning, Visual Perception, Wrist
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review