The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Double dissociation of memory capacities after bilateral occipital-lobe or medial temporal-lobe lesions
Abstract
Memory for recently encountered information can be reflected in conscious recall and recognition of that material, or in facilitated reprocessing of that material, an effect known as repetition priming. Repetition priming may be perceptual (form-based) or conceptual (meaning-based). A patient with bilateral occipital-lobe lesions (L.H.) and a patient with bilateral medial-temporal lobe lesions (H.M.) showed a double dissociation between visuoperceptual priming (impaired in L.H. and intact in H.M.) and visual recognition memory (intact in L.H. and impaired in H.M.). L.H. showed intact conceptual priming for visually presented words; his pattern of impaired visuoperceptual priming and intact conceptual priming is the reverse dissociation to that observed in prior studies of patients with Alzheimer's disease, in whom occipital cortices are relatively spared. These double dissociations suggest that a memory system localized to the occipital lobe mediates visuoperceptual priming effects, and that this system is independent of neural circuits mediating conceptual priming effects, and independent of the limbic-diencephalic system supporting conscious recognition of recently encountered information.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A neostriatal habit learning system in humans
Knowlton, B. J., Mangels, J. A., & Squire, L. R. (1996) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.273.5280.1399 · Cited by 1,777
Competition among multiple memory systems: converging evidence from animal and human brain studies
Poldrack, R. A., & Packard, M. G. (2003) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/s0028-3932(02)00157-4 · Cited by 880
COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE OF HUMAN MEMORY
Gabrieli, J. D. E. (1998) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.49.1.87 · Cited by 808
Self-citationWhat's new with the amnesic patient H.M.?
Corkin, S. (2002) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn726 · Cited by 726
Self-citationImaging Cognition: An Empirical Review of PET Studies with Normal Subjects
Cabeza, R., & Nyberg, L. (1997) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.1997.9.1.1 · Cited by 451
Metadata
- Authors
- Keane, M. M., Gabrieli, J. D. E., Mapstone, H. C., Johnson, K. A., & Corkin, S.
- Venue
- Brain
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1995
- Volume
- 118
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1129-1148
- ISSN
- 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2156
- OpenAlex
- W2015588388
- Cited by
- 187
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Double dissociation of memory capacities after bilateral occipital-lobe or medial temporal-lobe lesions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/brain/118.5.1129
- The paper
- Keane, M. M., Gabrieli, J. D. E., Mapstone, H. C., Johnson, K. A., & Corkin, S. (1995). Double dissociation of memory capacities after bilateral occipital-lobe or medial temporal-lobe lesions. Brain. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/118.5.1129
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.