The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Deactivation of human visual cortex during involuntary ocular oscillations: A PET activation study
Open accessAbstract
Prompted by the observation of decreased glucose metabolism in the striate and extrastriate visual cortex in a patient with opsoclonus, we studied the influence of involuntary eye movements on visual cortex activity. Repeated measurements of cerebral blood flow (CBF) by PET were performed in 12 healthy volunteers using H2(15)O-bolus technique after ear canal irrigation with ice cold or warm (44 degrees C) water with the subjects eyes closed. In addition to blood flow increases in areas involved in central vestibular processing, statistical subtraction analysis revealed a nearly symmetrical, bilateral, highly significant decrease in the occipital cortex covering Brodmann areas 17, 18, and 19 after ice water stimulation of either ears. Region of interest analysis revealed in all subjects a mean decrease in regional CBF (rCBF) of 12.8% (range 4.6-21.0%) in these areas. A similar but less pronounced effect (mean rCBF decrease in visual cortex 4.8%, range 1.1-11.5%) was observed after warm water irrigation. The observations suggest that deactivation of the visual cortex is induced by involuntary ocular oscillations. This deactivation is not dependent on changes of the retinal input (eyes closed). The physiological significance of this hitherto unknown phenomenon may be the protection from inadequate visual input (oscillopsia) during involuntary ocular oscillations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sokoloff, L., Reivich, M., Kennedy, C., Rosiers, M. H. D., Patlak, C. S., Pettigrew, K. D., Sakurada, O., & Shinohara, M. (1977) · Journal of Neurochemistry · doi:10.1111/j.1471-4159.1977.tb10649.x · Cited by 6,000
(1995) · PubMed Central · doi:10.2967/jnumed.120.252510a · Cited by 996
Self-citation
Cited by
The spatial and temporal signatures of word production components
Indefrey, P., & Levelt, W. J. M. (2004) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2002.06.001 · Cited by 2,144
Haemodynamic brain responses to acute pain in humans
Peyron, R., García-Larrea, L., Grégoire, M.-C., Costes, N., Convers, P., Lavenne, F., Mauguière, F., Michel, D., & Laurent, B. (1999) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/122.9.1765 · Cited by 580
The thalamocortical vestibular system in animals and humans.
Lopez, C., & Blanke, O. (2011) · Brain Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.brainresrev.2010.12.002 · Cited by 565
Dominance for Vestibular Cortical Function in the Non-dominant Hemisphere
Dieterich, M. (2003) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/13.9.994 · Cited by 538
Self-citationGuldin, W. O., & Grüsser, O.-J. (1998) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/s0166-2236(97)01211-3 · Cited by 504
Metadata
- Authors
- Wenzel, R., Bartenstein, P., Dieterich, M., Danek, A., Weindl, A., Minoshima, S., Ziegler, S., Schwaiger, M., & Brandt, T.
- Venue
- Brain
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1996
- Volume
- 119
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 101-110
- ISSN
- 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2156
- OpenAlex
- W2190523884
- Cited by
- 195
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 8.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Deactivation of human visual cortex during involuntary ocular oscillations: A PET activation study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/brain/119.1.101
- The paper
- Wenzel, R., Bartenstein, P., Dieterich, M., Danek, A., Weindl, A., Minoshima, S., Ziegler, S., Schwaiger, M., & Brandt, T. (1996). Deactivation of human visual cortex during involuntary ocular oscillations: A PET activation study. Brain. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/119.1.101
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.