Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 195

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Deactivation of human visual cortex during involuntary ocular oscillations: A PET activation study

Open access
Wenzel, R., Bartenstein, P., Dieterich, M., Danek, A., Weindl, A., Minoshima, S., Ziegler, S., Schwaiger, M., Brandt, Th.·1996·Brain

Abstract

Prompted by the observation of decreased glucose metabolism in the striate and extrastriate visual cortex in a patient with opsoclonus, we studied the influence of involuntary eye movements on visual cortex activity. Repeated measurements of cerebral blood flow (CBF) by PET were performed in 12 healthy volunteers using H2(15)O-bolus technique after ear canal irrigation with ice cold or warm (44 degrees C) water with the subjects eyes closed. In addition to blood flow increases in areas involved in central vestibular processing, statistical subtraction analysis revealed a nearly symmetrical, bilateral, highly significant decrease in the occipital cortex covering Brodmann areas 17, 18, and 19 after ice water stimulation of either ears. Region of interest analysis revealed in all subjects a mean decrease in regional CBF (rCBF) of 12.8% (range 4.6-21.0%) in these areas. A similar but less pronounced effect (mean rCBF decrease in visual cortex 4.8%, range 1.1-11.5%) was observed after warm water irrigation. The observations suggest that deactivation of the visual cortex is induced by involuntary ocular oscillations. This deactivation is not dependent on changes of the retinal input (eyes closed). The physiological significance of this hitherto unknown phenomenon may be the protection from inadequate visual input (oscillopsia) during involuntary ocular oscillations.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/brain/119.1.101

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 195

Metadata

Authors
Wenzel, R., Bartenstein, P., Dieterich, M., Danek, A., Weindl, A., Minoshima, S., Ziegler, S., Schwaiger, M., & Brandt, T.
Venue
Brain
Published
1996
Volume
119
Issue
1
Pages
101-110
ISSN
  • 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2156
OpenAlex
W2190523884
Cited by
195
References
2
FWCI
8.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Deactivation of human visual cortex during involuntary ocular oscillations: A PET activation study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/brain/119.1.101
The paper
Wenzel, R., Bartenstein, P., Dieterich, M., Danek, A., Weindl, A., Minoshima, S., Ziegler, S., Schwaiger, M., & Brandt, T. (1996). Deactivation of human visual cortex during involuntary ocular oscillations: A PET activation study. Brain. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/119.1.101

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.