The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Contribution of different cortical areas in the temporal lobes to music processing
Abstract
Music processing ability was studied in 65 right-handed patients who had undergone unilateral temporal cortectomy for the relief of intractable epilepsy, and 24 matched normal controls. The ability to recognize changes in note intervals and to distinguish between different rhythms and metres was tested by presentation of sequences of simple musical phrases with variations in either pitch or temporal dimensions. The responses (right or wrong) enabled us to determine in which component of the music processing mechanism the patients had deficits and hence, knowing the positions of the surgical lesions, to identify their separate cerebral locations. The results showed that a right temporal cortectomy impaired the use of both contour and interval information in the discrimination of melodies and a left temporal cortectomy impaired only the use of interval information. Moreover, they underlined the importance of the superior temporal gyrus in melody processing. The excision of a part of the auditory areas (posterior part of the superior temporal gyrus) was found to be most detrimental for pitch and temporal variation processing. In the temporal dimension, we observed a dissociation between metre and rhythm and the critical involvement of the anterior part of the superior temporal gyrus in metric processing. This study highlights the relevance of dissociating musical abilities into their most significant cognitive components in order to identify their separate cerebral locations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory
Oldfield, R. C. (1971) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4 · Cited by 35,900
Cited by
Stevens' Handbook of Experimental Psychology
(2002) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/0471214426 · Cited by 1,632
Rhythm and Beat Perception in Motor Areas of the Brain
Grahn, J. A., & Brett, M. (2007) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.2007.19.5.893 · Cited by 1,050
Brain Organization for Music Processing
Peretz, I., & Zatorre, R. J. (2005) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070225 · Cited by 863
Neural pathways underlying vocal control
Jürgens, U. (2002) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0149-7634(01)00068-9 · Cited by 852
Morphology of Heschl's gyrus reflects enhanced activation in the auditory cortex of musicians
Schneider, P., Scherg, M., Dosch, H. G., Specht, H. J., Gutschalk, A., & Rupp, A. (2002) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn871 · Cited by 732
Metadata
- Authors
- Liegeois-Chauvel, C.
- Venue
- Brain
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1998-10-01
- Volume
- 121
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1853-1867
- ISSN
- 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2156
- OpenAlex
- W2113828118
- Cited by
- 445
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Contribution of different cortical areas in the temporal lobes to music processing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/brain/121.10.1853
- The paper
- Liegeois-Chauvel, C. (1998). Contribution of different cortical areas in the temporal lobes to music processing. Brain. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/121.10.1853
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.