The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Development of a multiple sclerosis functional composite as a clinical trial outcome measure
Abstract
The primary clinical outcome measure for evaluating multiple sclerosis in clinical trials has been Kurtzke's expanded disability status scale (EDSS). New therapies appear to favourably impact the course of multiple sclerosis and render continued use of placebo control groups more difficult. Consequently, future trials are likely to compare active treatment groups which will most probably require increased sample sizes in order to detect therapeutic efficacy. Because more responsive outcome measures will be needed for active arm comparison studies, the National Multiple Sclerosis Society's Advisory Committee on Clinical Trials of New Agents in Multiple Sclerosis appointed a Task Force that was charged with developing improved clinical outcome measures. This Task Force acquired contemporary clinical trial and historical multiple sclerosis data for meta-analyses of primary and secondary outcome assessments to provide a basis for recommending a new outcome measure. A composite measure encompassing the major clinical dimensions of arm, leg and cognitive function was identified and termed the multiple sclerosis functional composite (MSFC). The MSFC consists of three objective quantitative tests of neurological function which are easy to administer. Change in this MSFC over the first year of observation predicted subsequent change in the EDSS, suggesting that the MSFC is more sensitive to change than the EDSS. This paper provides details concerning the development and testing of the MSFC.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: An expanded disability status scale (EDSS)
Kurtzke, J. F. (1983) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.33.11.1444 · Cited by 15,011
Paced Auditory Serial-Addition Task: A Measure of Recovery from Concussion
Gronwall, D. M. A. (1977) · Perceptual and Motor Skills · doi:10.2466/pms.1977.44.2.367 · Cited by 2,395
Cited by
Cohen, J. A., Coles, A. J., Arnold, D. L., Confavreux, C., Fox, E. J., Hartung, H.-P., Havrdova, E., Selmaj, K. W., Weiner, H. L., Fisher, E., et al. (2012) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(12)61769-3 · Cited by 1,205
Coles, A. J., Twyman, C. L., Arnold, D. L., Cohen, J. A., Confavreux, C., Fox, E. J., Hartung, H.-P., Havrdova, E., Selmaj, K. W., Weiner, H. L., et al. (2012) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(12)61768-1 · Cited by 1,198
Multiple Sclerosis Severity Score: Using disability and disease duration to rate disease severity
Roxburgh, R. H. S. R., Seaman, S. R., Masterman, T., Hensiek, A. E., Sawcer, S. J., Vukusic, S., Achiti, I., Confavreux, C., Coustans, M., le Page, E., et al. (2005) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000156155.19270.f8 · Cited by 963
The Preclinical Alzheimer Cognitive Composite: Measuring Amyloid-Related Decline
Donohue, M. C., Sperling, R. A., Salmon, D. P., Rentz, D. M., Raman, R., Thomas, R. G., Weiner, M., & Aisen, P. S. (2014) · JAMA Neurology · doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2014.803 · Cited by 860
A consensus protocol for the standardization of cerebrospinal fluid collection and biobanking
Teunissen, C. E., Petzold, A., Bennett, J. L., Berven, F. S., Brundin, L., Comabella, M., Franciotta, D., Frederiksen, J. L., Fleming, J. O., Furlan, R., et al. (2009) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0b013e3181c47cc2 · Cited by 845
Metadata
- Authors
- Cutter, G. R.
- Venue
- Brain
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1999-05-01
- Volume
- 122
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 871-882
- ISSN
- 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2156
- OpenAlex
- W2104878804
- Cited by
- 1,190
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 12.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Development of a multiple sclerosis functional composite as a clinical trial outcome measure. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/brain/122.5.871
- The paper
- Cutter, G. R. (1999). Development of a multiple sclerosis functional composite as a clinical trial outcome measure. Brain. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/122.5.871
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.