Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 234

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cognitive function in primary progressive and transitional progressive multiple sclerosis: A controlled study with MRI correlates

Open access
Camp, S. J., Stevenson, V. L., Thompson, A. J., Miller, D. H., Borras, C., Auriacombe, S., Brochet, B., Falautano, M., Filippi, M., Herisse-Dulo, L., Montalban, X., Parrcira, E., Polman, C. H., De Sa, J., Langdon, D. W.·1999·Brain

Abstract

The relative rarity of primary progressive (PP) and transitional progressive (TP) multiple sclerosis has meant that little documentation of cognitive function in such patients is currently available. The aim of this study was to investigate the cognitive skills of patients with PP and TP multiple sclerosis relative to matched healthy controls, and to examine the relationship of this impairment to MRI parameters. Sixty-three patients (43 PP, 20 TP) were individually matched with healthy controls, who undertook the same cognitive tasks as the patient group. The neuropsychological assessment comprised Rao's brief repeatable battery, a reasoning test, and a measure of depression. Patients also underwent T1- and T2-weighted brain MRI. These patients were taken from a larger cohort (158 PP, 33 TP) in whom it had been demonstrated that the re were no significant differences between the mean scores of the PP and TP groups on any of the cognitive variables. The 63 patients were therefore taken as one group for comparison with the healthy controls. These patients performed significantly worse than the controls in tests of verbal memory, attention, verbal fluency and spatial reasoning. An impairment index was constructed and applied to the patient data. This correlated modestly with T2-lesion load (r = 0.45, P = 0.01), T1-hypointensity load (r = 0.45, P = 0.01) and cerebral volume (r = -0.35, P = 0.01). Thus, PP and TP multiple sclerosis patients demonstrate significant cognitive dysfunction when compared with matched healthy controls. The relationship between this impairment and MRI parameters is moderate, suggesting that cognitive dysfunction in PP and TP multiple sclerosis has a complex and multifactorial aetiology, which is not adequately explained by pathology as demonstrated on conventional MRI.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/brain/122.7.1341

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 234

Metadata

Authors
Camp, S. J., Stevenson, V. L., Thompson, A. J., Miller, D. H., Borras, C., Auriacombe, S., Brochet, B., Falautano, M., Filippi, M., Herisse-Dulo, L., Montalban, X., Parrcira, E., Polman, C. H., De Sa, J., & Langdon, D. W.
Venue
Brain
Published
1999-07-01
Volume
122
Issue
7
Pages
1341-1348
ISSN
  • 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2156
OpenAlex
W2148514224
Cited by
234
References
2
FWCI
7.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cognitive function in primary progressive and transitional progressive multiple sclerosis: A controlled study with MRI correlates. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/brain/122.7.1341
The paper
Camp, S. J., Stevenson, V. L., Thompson, A. J., Miller, D. H., Borras, C., Auriacombe, S., Brochet, B., Falautano, M., Filippi, M., Herisse-Dulo, L., Montalban, X., Parrcira, E., Polman, C. H., De Sa, J., & Langdon, D. W. (1999). Cognitive function in primary progressive and transitional progressive multiple sclerosis: A controlled study with MRI correlates. Brain. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/122.7.1341

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.