Cited by 176Multiple Sclerosis Research StudiesCancer survivorship and careMindfulness and Compassion Interventions

Multiple sclerosis: Empirical literature for the clinical health psychologist

Mohr, David C., Cox, Darcy·2001·Journal of Clinical Psychology

Abstract

This article reviews the empirical literature related to clinical health psychology in multiple sclerosis (MS). MS is a disease in which the immune system attacks the central nervous system. As such, the interactions between medical and psychological variables are complex, and potentially of considerable importance to patients. Common neuropsychological and psychological problems associated with MS and their etiologies are reviewed. The effects of stress and depression on MS exacerbation are discussed, including clinical, immune, endocrine, and neuroimaging findings. The types of coping common in MS and their effects on adjustment are discussed. The empirical literature on psychological and neuropsychological intervention is reviewed. The small literature on caregiving in MS is also summarized.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jclp.1042

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies comparing multiple sclerosis patients with patients suffering from another degenerative deficiency (arthritis) have not established a specific link between anxiety symptoms and multiple sclerosis.

    “Des travaux ayant comparé des patients atteints de sclérose en plaques avec des patients souffrant d'une autre déficience dégénérative (arthrite) n'ont toutefois pas permis d'établir un lien spécifique entre les symptômes anxieux et la sclérose en plaques [32,33].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mohr, D. C., & Cox, D.
Affiliations
University of California, San Francisco (US)
Corresponding author
Mohr, David C.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2001-04
Volume
57
Issue
4
Pages
479-499
ISSN
  • 0021-9762 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-4679
OpenAlex
W2112201125
Cited by
176
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 9
FWCI
1.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01-MH59708, R01MH059708)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
Keywords
multiple sclerosis, neuropsychological problems, mental illness, stress, depression, disease exacerbation, immune system, endocrine system, neuroimaging, coping, psychological adjustment, psychological intervention, neuropsychological intervention, caregiving
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Anger, Central Nervous System, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Mental Health, Middle Aged, Multiple Sclerosis, Psychotherapy, Stress, Psychological, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Caregivers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review