Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,756

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The substantia nigra of the human brain

Damier, P., Hirsch, E. C., Agid, Y., Graybiel, A. M.·1999·Brain

Abstract

To achieve accuracy in studying the patterns of loss of midbrain dopamine-containing neurons in Parkinson's disease, we used compartmental patterns of calbindin D(28K) immunostaining to subdivide the substantia nigra with landmarks independent of the degenerative process. Within the substantia nigra pars compacta, we identified dopamine-containing neurons in the calbindin-rich regions ('matrix') and in five calbindin-poor pockets ('nigrosomes') defined by analysis of the three-dimensional networks formed by the calbindin-poor zones. These zones were recognizable in all of the brains, despite severe loss of dopamine-containing neurons. The degree of loss of dopamine-containing neurons in the substantia nigra pars compacta was related to the duration of the disease, and the cell loss followed a strict order. The degree of neuronal loss was significantly higher in the nigrosomes than in the matrix. Depletion was maximum (98%) in the main pocket (nigrosome 1), located in the caudal and mediolateral part of the substantia nigra pars compacta. Progressively less cell loss was detectable in more medial and more rostral nigrosomes, following the stereotyped order of nigrosome 1 > nigrosome 2 > nigrosome 4 > nigrosome 3 > nigrosome 5. A parallel, but lesser, caudorostral gradient of cell loss was observed for dopamine-containing neurons included in the matrix. This pattern of neuronal loss was consistent from one parkinsonian substantia nigra pars compacta to another. The spatiotemporal progression of neuronal loss related to disease duration can thus be drawn in the substantia nigra pars compacta for each Parkinson's disease patient: depletion begins in the main pocket (nigrosome 1) and then spreads to other nigrosomes and the matrix along rostral, medial and dorsal axes of progression.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/brain/122.8.1437

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 1,756

Metadata

Authors
Damier, P., Hirsch, E. C., Agid, Y., & Graybiel, A. M.
Venue
Brain
Published
1999-08
Volume
122
Issue
8
Pages
1437-1448
ISSN
  • 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2156
OpenAlex
W1974898145
Cited by
1,756
References
3
FWCI
13.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The substantia nigra of the human brain. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/brain/122.8.1437
The paper
Damier, P., Hirsch, E. C., Agid, Y., & Graybiel, A. M. (1999). The substantia nigra of the human brain. Brain. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/122.8.1437

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.